<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mary+Hodder</id>
	<title>IDESG Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mary+Hodder"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mary_Hodder"/>
	<updated>2026-05-26T16:04:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5711</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5711"/>
		<updated>2018-06-20T20:12:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* REFERENCES */ fixed text explanation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IDENTITY PROVIDERS and RELYING PARTIES which employ intermediaries are responsible for the actions of those intermediaries on their behalf, MUST implement protocols that mitigate the risk of intermediaries collecting personal information.  See [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] and [[Interop_Best_Practice_E|INTEROP-BP-E]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
References and Guidance (non-normative)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.5 (&amp;quot;Data minimization&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* See AICPA/CICA Privacy Maturity Model based on GAPP [Collection 4.1.X] (chart) &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46], Audit [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Privacy References and Guides]]; this page is a living document from the Privacy Committee, and as such will be added to over time. It has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Relying Parties, Identity Providers, Attribute Providers, Intermediaries, Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5710</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5710"/>
		<updated>2018-06-20T20:11:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* REFERENCES */ updated page name&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IDENTITY PROVIDERS and RELYING PARTIES which employ intermediaries are responsible for the actions of those intermediaries on their behalf, MUST implement protocols that mitigate the risk of intermediaries collecting personal information.  See [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] and [[Interop_Best_Practice_E|INTEROP-BP-E]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
References and Guidance (non-normative)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.5 (&amp;quot;Data minimization&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* See AICPA/CICA Privacy Maturity Model based on GAPP [Collection 4.1.X] (chart) &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46], Audit [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Privacy References and Guides]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Relying Parties, Identity Providers, Attribute Providers, Intermediaries, Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_5&amp;diff=5860</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_5&amp;diff=5860"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T22:00:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added info from linked SG page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-5.    DATA AGGREGATION RISK ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST assess the privacy risk of aggregating [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]], in systems and processes where it is collected, generated, used, transmitted, or stored, and wherever feasible, MUST design and operate their systems and processes to minimize that risk.   Entities MUST assess and limit linkages of personal information across multiple transactions without the [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USER]]&#039;s explicit consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collection of personal information from repeated data transactions, which can be associated to form&lt;br /&gt;
a larger body of knowledge about individuals, may increase their privacy risk. For example: An Identity&lt;br /&gt;
Provider’s ability to facilitate transactions between a user and multiple relying parties may give the&lt;br /&gt;
Identity Provider privileged insights into the users’ behavior. Such information is the result of the&lt;br /&gt;
Identity Provider’s ability to link user interactions across transactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Users’ explicit consent” alone should not be used to mitigate privacy risks created by technical&lt;br /&gt;
architecture or design, such as to mitigate risks that individuals could not be reasonably expected to be&lt;br /&gt;
able to assess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirements [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]] on&lt;br /&gt;
the application of limitations to, and scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collection of personal information from repeated data transactions, which can be associated to form a larger body of knowledge about individuals, increases their privacy risk if the aggregated data exceeds the amount and nature needed for the original purposes of collection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References and Guidance (non-normative) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* PbD De-identification Center, https://www.privacybydesign.ca/index.php/de-identification-centre/  &lt;br /&gt;
* See also the definition of &amp;quot;data aggregation&amp;quot; in § 164.501, and the discussions about the use of identified versus de-identified data in § 164.514(a),(b) and § 164.502(d), of the HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164:  http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=pt45.1.164&amp;amp;rgn=div5    &lt;br /&gt;
* See OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) v1.0: Section 4.2 (&amp;quot;Service Details&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords AGGREGATION|AGGREGATION]], [[IDEF Keywords CONSENT|CONSENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_4&amp;diff=5842</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 4</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_4&amp;diff=5842"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T21:58:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added info from linked SG page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-4.    CREDENTIAL LIMITATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST NOT request [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]]’ credentials unless necessary for the transaction and then only as appropriate to the risk associated with the transaction or to the risks to the parties associated with the transaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Intermediaries may not have a direct relationship with individuals whose data moves through their systems,&lt;br /&gt;
but should facilitate endpoints&#039; ability to conform to this Requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of “intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability.&amp;quot; This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Psuedonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Requirements [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]] on the application of limitations to, and scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Credentials bound to identifiers, like attributes bound to identifiers, carry increased risk of inappropriate disclosure when stored.  See generally [[Privacy_Req_1|PRIVACY-1]].   This requirement PRIVACY-4 assumes that the privacy risk analysis required by [[Privacy_Req_5|PRIVACY-5]] will inform an entity&#039;s decisions about credential retention.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References and Guidance (non-normative) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Privacy_Req_2|PRIVACY-2]] and [[Privacy_Req_3|PRIVACY-3]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CREDENTIAL|CREDENTIAL]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]], [[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5825</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5825"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T21:57:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added info from linked page for SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-3.    ATTRIBUTE MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities requesting [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attributes]] MUST evaluate the need to collect specific attributes in a transaction, as opposed to claims regarding those attributes.  Wherever feasible, entities MUST collect, generate, use, transmit, and store claims about [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] rather than attributes.   Wherever feasible, attributes MUST be transmitted as claims, and transmitted credentials and identities MUST be bound to claims instead of actual attribute values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Where feasible, Identity Providers (and any other entities releasing attributes) should provide the&lt;br /&gt;
opportunity for attributes to be released as claims as well as detailed attributes; see also [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1&lt;br /&gt;
(DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on granularity of requests to support data minimization by requesters, generally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute providers may be required by their own legal or business processes to collect and store, although&lt;br /&gt;
not necessarily transmit, attributes in their attribute form, in which case significant alteration or&lt;br /&gt;
filtering may be required when that data is re-used or transmitted to others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, an attribute could be a birth date and a claim could be “old enough to buy alcohol beverage in the state of WA”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IDENTITY-PROVIDERS (and any other entities releasing attributes MUST provide the opportunity for attributes to be released as claims as well as detailed attributes; see also [[Privacy_Req_1|PRIVACY-1]] on granularity of requests to support data minimization by requesters, generally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute providers may be required by their own business processes to collect and store, although not necessarily transmit, attributes in their attribute form, in which case significant alteration or filtering may be required when that data is re-used or transmitted to others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References and Guidance (non-normative) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* NIST SP 800-162: Attribute Based Access Control Definition and Considerations (2014), pages 26, 28, 31: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-162/sp800_162_pre-publication.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ATTRIBUTES|ATTRIBUTE]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5807</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5807"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T18:00:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-2.    PURPOSE LIMITATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the use of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] that is collected, used, transmitted, or stored to the specified purposes of that transaction.  Persistent records of contracts, assurances, consent, or legal authority MUST be established by entities collecting, generating, using, transmitting, or storing personal information, so that the information consistently is used in the same manner originally specified and permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]]. Entities should also assure that their data&lt;br /&gt;
controls reliably apply these limitations to their future actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirement [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on the application of limitations to, and&lt;br /&gt;
scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice G|INTEROP-BP-G (RECOMMENDED LEGAL COMPLIANCE)]]&lt;br /&gt;
regarding limitations imposed by laws. Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice F|INTEROP-BP-F&lt;br /&gt;
(RECOMMENDED FEDERATION COMPLIANCE)]] and Requirement [[Interop Req 6|INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY&lt;br /&gt;
COMPLIANCE)]] regarding limitations arising from the involvement of THIRD-PARTIES such as&lt;br /&gt;
intermediaries, similar service providers, or FEDERATIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of&lt;br /&gt;
“intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability. This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Pseudonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contracts, assurances or persistent records of consent or legal authority MUST be established by entities collecting, using, transmitting or storing personal information, so that the information, when passed between entities, is still used in the same manner as originally specified and permitted.  Entities also must assure that their data controls reliably apply these limitations to their future actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note the applicability of requirement [[Interop_Req_7|INTEROP-7]] regarding limitations imposed by laws.  Please note the applicability of requirements [[Interop_Req_6|INTEROP-6]] and [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] regarding limitations arising from the involvement of THIRD-PARTIES such as intermediaries, similar service providers, or FEDERATIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References and Guidance (non-normative) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.3 (&amp;quot;Use, Retention and Disclosure Limitation&amp;quot;) and Section 5.6 (&amp;quot;Purpose Legitimacy and Specification&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard in HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=pt45.1.164&amp;amp;rgn=div5    &lt;br /&gt;
* See also the Fair Information Privacy Principles:  &amp;quot;Organizations should use PII solely for the purpose(s) specified in the notice. Sharing PII should be for a purpose compatible with the purpose for which the PII was collected.&amp;quot;  http://www.nist.gov/nstic/NSTIC-FIPPs.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
* See OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) v1.0: Section 4.2 (&amp;quot;Service Details&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46],Audit [p47], and Storage [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5806</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5806"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T17:58:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added appendix A supplemental information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-2.    PURPOSE LIMITATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the use of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] that is collected, used, transmitted, or stored to the specified purposes of that transaction.  Persistent records of contracts, assurances, consent, or legal authority MUST be established by entities collecting, generating, using, transmitting, or storing personal information, so that the information consistently is used in the same manner originally specified and permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]]. Entities should also assure that their data&lt;br /&gt;
controls reliably apply these limitations to their future actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirement [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on the application of limitations to, and&lt;br /&gt;
scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice G|INTEROP-BP-G (RECOMMENDED LEGAL COMPLIANCE)]]&lt;br /&gt;
regarding limitations imposed by laws. Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice F|INTEROP-BP-F&lt;br /&gt;
(RECOMMENDED FEDERATION COMPLIANCE)]] and Requirement [[Interop Req 6|INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY&lt;br /&gt;
COMPLIANCE)]] regarding limitations arising from the involvement of THIRD-PARTIES such as&lt;br /&gt;
intermediaries, similar service providers, or FEDERATIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of&lt;br /&gt;
“intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability. This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Pseudonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Supplemental Guidance&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These links are provided as additional informative resources relevant to parties conducting self-assessments (and other identity stakeholders) when applying and evaluating IDEF Baseline Requirement PRIVACY-2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contracts, assurances or persistent records of consent or legal authority MUST be established by entities collecting, using, transmitting or storing personal information, so that the information, when passed between entities, is still used in the same manner as originally specified and permitted.  Entities also must assure that their data controls reliably apply these limitations to their future actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note the applicability of requirement [[Interop_Req_7|INTEROP-7]] regarding limitations imposed by laws.  Please note the applicability of requirements [[Interop_Req_6|INTEROP-6]] and [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] regarding limitations arising from the involvement of THIRD-PARTIES such as intermediaries, similar service providers, or FEDERATIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References and Guidance (non-normative) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.3 (&amp;quot;Use, Retention and Disclosure Limitation&amp;quot;) and Section 5.6 (&amp;quot;Purpose Legitimacy and Specification&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard in HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=pt45.1.164&amp;amp;rgn=div5    &lt;br /&gt;
* See also the Fair Information Privacy Principles:  &amp;quot;Organizations should use PII solely for the purpose(s) specified in the notice. Sharing PII should be for a purpose compatible with the purpose for which the PII was collected.&amp;quot;  http://www.nist.gov/nstic/NSTIC-FIPPs.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
* See OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) v1.0: Section 4.2 (&amp;quot;Service Details&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46],Audit [p47], and Storage [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5709</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5709"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T17:51:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: syntax update&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IDENTITY PROVIDERS and RELYING PARTIES which employ intermediaries are responsible for the actions of those intermediaries on their behalf, MUST implement protocols that mitigate the risk of intermediaries collecting personal information.  See [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] and [[Interop_Best_Practice_E|INTEROP-BP-E]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
References and Guidance (non-normative)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.5 (&amp;quot;Data minimization&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* See AICPA/CICA Privacy Maturity Model based on GAPP [Collection 4.1.X] (chart) &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46], Audit [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Relying Parties, Identity Providers, Attribute Providers, Intermediaries, Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5708</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5708"/>
		<updated>2018-06-18T17:30:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added Supplemental info from the other appendix A SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Supplemental Information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IDENTITY PROVIDERS and RELYING PARTIES which employ intermediaries are responsible for the actions of those intermediaries on their behalf, MUST implement protocols that mitigate the risk of intermediaries collecting personal information.  See [[Interop_Req_8|INTEROP-8]] and [[Interop_Best_Practice_E|INTEROP-BP-E]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
References and Guidance (non-normative)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See ISO/IEC 29100 (2011) Privacy Framework, Section 5.5 (&amp;quot;Data minimization&amp;quot;).  &lt;br /&gt;
* See the HIPAA regulations for health care transactions, 45 CFR Part 164, at §§ 164.502(b) and 164.514(d):  &amp;quot;minimum necessary&amp;quot; disclosure standard.&lt;br /&gt;
* See AICPA/CICA Privacy Maturity Model based on GAPP [Collection 4.1.X] (chart) &lt;br /&gt;
* See Privacy &amp;amp; Biometrics: Building a Conceptual Foundation: Data [p46], Audit [p47].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Relying Parties &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_C&amp;diff=5458</id>
		<title>Privacy Best Practice C</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_C&amp;diff=5458"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T21:00:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated roles for Phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-BP-C.    RECOMMENDED CONSEQUENCES OF DECLINING ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities SHOULD provide short, clear notice to [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] of the consequences of declining to provide mandatory and optional [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
This recommendation builds on and improves the mandate in Requirement [[Privacy Req 11|PRIVACY-11 (OPTIONAL&lt;br /&gt;
INFORMATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]]. See also&lt;br /&gt;
the [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0#Usability|IDESG Usability Requirements]] (USABLE-1 through USABLE-7) regarding the clarity of notices given&lt;br /&gt;
to [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If personal information is requested from USERS during registration that is optional, that designation&lt;br /&gt;
should include a short and clear description justifying the request of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If information collection or attribute value release is designated as mandatory, that designation&lt;br /&gt;
should include a short and clear description of the consequences of declining to provide that&lt;br /&gt;
information or allowing that release.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an entity requests to release attributes values during a transaction that are the beyond the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum necessary to complete that transaction, that release should be clearly presented as&lt;br /&gt;
optional/a choice. That optional designation should include a short and clear description justifying the&lt;br /&gt;
release of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords NOTICE|NOTICE]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_B&amp;diff=5448</id>
		<title>Privacy Best Practice B</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_B&amp;diff=5448"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T21:00:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated roles edit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-BP-B.    RECOMMENDED TECHNOLOGY ENFORCEMENT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wherever feasible, privacy requirements and policies SHOULD be implemented through technical mechanisms. Those technical privacy controls SHOULD be situated as low in the technology stack as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Privacy controls are mechanisms that mitigate privacy risk. These may overlap with security controls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements or best practices can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived as of October 2015 at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ARCHITECTURE|ARCHITECTURE]], [[IDEF Keywords POLICIES|POLICIES]], [[IDEF Keywords PROCESS|PROCESS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_B&amp;diff=5447</id>
		<title>Privacy Best Practice B</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_B&amp;diff=5447"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:59:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated roles for Phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-BP-B.    RECOMMENDED TECHNOLOGY ENFORCEMENT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wherever feasible, privacy requirements and policies SHOULD be implemented through technical mechanisms. Those technical privacy controls SHOULD be situated as low in the technology stack as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Privacy controls are mechanisms that mitigate privacy risk. These may overlap with security controls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements or best practices can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived as of October 2015 at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ARCHITECTURE|ARCHITECTURE]], [[IDEF Keywords POLICIES|POLICIES]], [[IDEF Keywords PROCESS|PROCESS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_A&amp;diff=5439</id>
		<title>Privacy Best Practice A</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Best_Practice_A&amp;diff=5439"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:59:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated roles for Phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-BP-A.   RECOMMENDED QUALITY CONTROLS ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities SHOULD determine the necessary quality of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] used in their [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] based on the risk of those functions and the information, including risk to the [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Entities obtaining personal information about a [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USER]] may have multiple ways to obtain the&lt;br /&gt;
necessary data, or to assure its quality (generally, its accuracy, detail, timeliness or authoritative&lt;br /&gt;
source). Some of those choices may be less invasive, or create less risk of USER privacy loss, than&lt;br /&gt;
others. Additionally, some may result in higher- or lower-quality accuracy of the data. Entities SHOULD&lt;br /&gt;
consider the effects of these choices on the USER whose personal information is being collected and&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the absence of formal data quality standards, entities SHOULD consider the timeliness,&lt;br /&gt;
completeness, accuracy, and sources of data when evaluating the quality of personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
These goals may be most easily implemented in system design, when identity management systems are&lt;br /&gt;
being designed or renovated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements or best practices can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived as of October 2015 at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ARCHITECTURE|ARCHITECTURE]], [[IDEF Keywords DATA-INTEGRITY|DATA-INTEGRITY]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_15&amp;diff=5769</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 15</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_15&amp;diff=5769"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:56:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG and roles for Phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-15.    ATTRIBUTE SEGREGATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wherever feasible, identifier data MUST be segregated from [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attribute]] data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User attributes can be used to narrow the pool of potential real world human beings to the point where the real world identity can be determined. That said, there are a set of user static identifiers which must be protected from disclosure above more general user information. An example of the identifiers that need special protection include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Legal Name &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Social Security Number &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Street address of domicile &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Cell phone number &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Email address &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When recent identity protocols (like OpenID Connect) are used, it is technically possible to authenticate a user with no user identifiers or attributes at all. In that case the user identifiers in the protocol between digital entities should be opaque to the extent that any party outside of the Identity Provider and the Relying party will not be able to use those identifiers in any other context. In that case other baseline requirements will apply.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ARCHITECTURE|ARCHITECTURE]], [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|ATTRIBUTE]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PROCESS|PROCESS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_14&amp;diff=5760</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 14</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_14&amp;diff=5760"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:54:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-14.    DATA RETENTION AND DISPOSAL==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the retention of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the time necessary for providing and administering the functions and services to [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] for which the information was collected, except as otherwise required by law or regulation. When no longer needed, personal information MUST be&lt;br /&gt;
securely disposed of in a manner aligning with appropriate industry standards and/or legal&lt;br /&gt;
requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Retention requirements arising from &amp;quot;law, regulation or legal process&amp;quot; may include litigation-related&lt;br /&gt;
legal holds, and requirements arising from mandatory audits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Functions” refer to the functions listed in the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model]; see supplemental guidance&lt;br /&gt;
in [[Privacy Req 13|PRIVACY-13 (CONTROLS PROPORTIONATE TO RISK)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]], [[IDEF Keywords RETENTION|RETENTION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_13&amp;diff=5751</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 13</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_13&amp;diff=5751"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:53:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-13.    CONTROLS PROPORTIONATE TO RISK ==&lt;br /&gt;
Controls on the processing or use of [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]]&#039; [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] MUST be commensurate with the degree of risk of that processing or use.  A privacy risk analysis MUST be conducted by entities who conduct [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]], to establish what risks those functions pose to users&#039; privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many risk analysis models include examples or guidance about the implementation of controls that&lt;br /&gt;
are appropriate to either specific risks or levels of existing risk. Entities may satisfy this Requirement by&lt;br /&gt;
confirming that they have conducted that risk assessment and, based on that assessment, made&lt;br /&gt;
appropriate adjustments to their practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords CONTROL|CONTROLS]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords POLICIES|POLICIES]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_12&amp;diff=5742</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_12&amp;diff=5742"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:52:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-12.    ANONYMITY ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wherever feasible, entities MUST utilize identity systems and processes that enable transactions that are anonymous, anonymous with validated [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attributes]], pseudonymous, or where appropriate, uniquely identified.  Where applicable to such transactions, entities employing service providers or intermediaries MUST mitigate the risk of those [[IDEF Glossary THIRD PARTIES|THIRD-PARTIES]] collecting [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USER]] [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]]. Organizations MUST request individuals’ credentials only when necessary for the transaction and&lt;br /&gt;
then only as appropriate to the risk associated with the transaction or only as appropriate to the&lt;br /&gt;
risks to the parties associated with the transaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
In support of legal, policy or personal requirements for anonymous or pseudonymous USER&lt;br /&gt;
participation, [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] and systems should permit anonymous and&lt;br /&gt;
(persistent across sessions) pseudonymous registration and participation, where required by law or&lt;br /&gt;
otherwise feasible. To further facilitate that goal, identifiers and personal data (including attributes)&lt;br /&gt;
should be kept separate wherever feasible: see [[Privacy Req 4|PRIVACY-4 (CREDENTIAL LIMITATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 15|PRIVACY-15 (ATTRIBUTE SEGREGATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Risk needs to be assigned by each entity based the risk of loss to assets or reputation of that entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Interop Req 6|INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY COMPLIANCE)]] on the mitigation of risks associated with third-party&lt;br /&gt;
service providers or data users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Privacy Req 5|PRIVACY-5 (DATA AGGREGATION RISK)]] regarding the risk of collecting additional information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Privacy Req 13|PRIVACY-13 (CONTROLS PROPORTIONATE TO RISK)]] regarding the implementation of controls to&lt;br /&gt;
mitigate identified privacy risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Privacy Req 11|PRIVACY-11 (OPTIONAL INFORMATION)]] regarding availability of user choices regarding optional&lt;br /&gt;
disclosure of personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ACCOUNT|ACCOUNT]], [[IDEF Keywords ANONYMITY|ANONYMITY]], [[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_11&amp;diff=5732</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 11</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_11&amp;diff=5732"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:48:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated roles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-11.    OPTIONAL INFORMATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST clearly indicate to [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] what [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] is mandatory and what information is optional prior to the transaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also the [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0#Usability|IDESG Usability Requirements]] (USABLE-1 through USABLE-7) regarding the clarity of&lt;br /&gt;
notices given to USERS and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional best practices for indicating optionality are provided in [[Privacy Best Practice C|PRIVACY-BP-C (RECOMMENDED&lt;br /&gt;
CONSEQUENCES OF DECLINING)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be appropriate to have a &amp;quot;don&#039;t ask me again&amp;quot; check box for a series of transactions of the&lt;br /&gt;
same type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example: If personal information is requested from USERS during registration that is beyond the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum necessary to complete an eligibility decision, that personal information should be clearly&lt;br /&gt;
marked as optional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;mandatory&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;optional&amp;quot;, in this Requirement, if personal information is requested&lt;br /&gt;
from USERS during registration that is beyond the minimum necessary to complete an eligibility&lt;br /&gt;
decision, that personal information should be clearly marked as optional. That optional designation&lt;br /&gt;
should include a short and clear description justifying the request of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an organization requests to release attributes values during a transaction that are the beyond the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum necessary to complete that transaction, that release should be clearly presented as&lt;br /&gt;
optional/a choice. That optional designation should include a short and clear description justifying the&lt;br /&gt;
release of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If information or attribute value release is designated as mandatory, that designation should include&lt;br /&gt;
a short and clear description of the consequences of declining to provide that information or allowing&lt;br /&gt;
that release. See [[Privacy Req 10|PRIVACY-10 (USER OPTION TO DECLINE)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords NOTICE|NOTICE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_10&amp;diff=5721</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_10&amp;diff=5721"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:45:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-10.    USER OPTION TO DECLINE ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] MUST have the opportunity to decline registration;  decline [[IDEF Glossary CREDENTIALS|credential]] provisioning;  decline the presentation of their credentials;  and decline release of their [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attributes]] or claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although an entity&#039;s [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] and transactions should provide an&lt;br /&gt;
opportunity to the USER to decline to provide personal information or consent to its use, that decision&lt;br /&gt;
may appropriately result in the partial or complete failure of the entity&#039;s intended transaction. (See&lt;br /&gt;
[[Usable Req 4|USABLE-4 (NAVIGATION)]], [[Usable Req 5|USABLE-5 (ACCESSIBILITY)]] and [[Usable Req 6|USABLE-6 (USABILITY FEEDBACK)]].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords CONSENT|CONSENT]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_9&amp;diff=5914</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 9</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_9&amp;diff=5914"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:44:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-9.    USER NOTICE OF CHANGES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST, upon any material changes to a service or process that affects the prior or ongoing collection, generation, use, transmission, or storage of [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]]’ &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]], notify those USERS, and provide them with compensating controls designed to mitigate privacy risks that may arise from those changes, which may include seeking express affirmative consent of USERS in accordance with relevant law or regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once USERS have been notified of the planned uses and processing of their personal information&lt;br /&gt;
(see [[Privacy Req 6|PRIVACY 6 (USAGE NOTICE)]]), and exercised whatever consent, limitation or withdrawal rights they&lt;br /&gt;
have (see [[Privacy Req 7|PRIVACY-7 (USER DATA CONTROL)]]), material changes to those uses or processing may render&lt;br /&gt;
their choices obsolete, so entities should refresh the USER&#039;s opportunity to exercise those controls in&lt;br /&gt;
light of the new information. (See [[Usable Req 4|USABLE-4 (NAVIGATION)]], [[Usable Req 5|USABLE-5 (ACCESSIBILITY)]] and [[Usable Req 6|USABLE-6&lt;br /&gt;
(USABILITY FEEDBACK)]].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Express affirmative consent” should not be used to mitigate privacy risks created by technical&lt;br /&gt;
architecture or design, or to mitigate risks that individuals could not be reasonably expected to be able&lt;br /&gt;
to assess; see [[Privacy Req 5|PRIVACY-5 (DATA AGGREGATION RISK)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Compensating controls” are controls or mechanisms, which may operate either by policy or&lt;br /&gt;
(preferably) technology, designed to mitigate privacy risks that may arise when a material change is&lt;br /&gt;
made to the system. Examples might include an opportunity to assent or withdraw, or risk-shifting&lt;br /&gt;
rules occurring upon a change. Those controls can be under user administration, but only if the user&lt;br /&gt;
can be reasonably expected to understand how to use those mechanisms to effectively mitigate their&lt;br /&gt;
risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Kantara Consent Receipt is now available (January 2018) in draft form at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wg-infosharing/553qIdgaq0o&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHANGES|CHANGES]], [[IDEF Keywords CONSENT|CONSENT]], [[IDEF Keywords NOTICE|NOTICE]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_8&amp;diff=5904</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 8</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_8&amp;diff=5904"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:43:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-8.    THIRD-PARTY LIMITATIONS ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wherever [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] make choices regarding the treatment of their [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]], those choices MUST be communicated effectively by that entity to any [[IDEF Glossary THIRD PARTIES|THIRD-PARTIES]] to which it transmits the personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One example of a USER&#039;s choice that creates a use limitation would be their election to restrict the&lt;br /&gt;
use of their personal information to specific purposes only. This Requirement broadly means that&lt;br /&gt;
entities convey all such restrictions to the &amp;quot;downstream&amp;quot; recipients of personal information, when they&lt;br /&gt;
share that information. However, this Requirement does not dictate what elective choices a USER&lt;br /&gt;
should be prompted to make; and it does not require an entity to convey (or enforce) a USER&#039;s choices&lt;br /&gt;
or instructions if those choices contradict law, regulation or legal process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note, [[Interop Req 6|Requirement INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY COMPLIANCE)]] also includes certain specific&lt;br /&gt;
duties in connection with THIRD-PARTIES receiving personal information from an entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responsibilities for liability should be spelled out in agreements between organizations exchanging&lt;br /&gt;
personal information in the identity ecosystem, as well as the format and style of the communication of&lt;br /&gt;
user-stated privacy preferences and information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This only applies instances of personal information passed to third parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords NOTICE|NOTICE]], [[IDEF Keywords PORTABILITY|PORTABILITY]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords THIRD PARTIES|THIRD-PARTIES]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_7&amp;diff=5893</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 7</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_7&amp;diff=5893"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:42:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-7.    USER DATA CONTROL ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST provide appropriate mechanisms to enable [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] to access, correct, and delete [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and&lt;br /&gt;
[[Interop Req 7|INTEROP-7 (USER REDRESS)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Appropriate” broadly means mechanisms for management of personal information should be&lt;br /&gt;
effective, easy to use, and accessible. (See [[Usable Req 1|USABLE-1 (USABILITY PRACTICES)]], [[Usable Req 3|USABLE-3 (PLAIN&lt;br /&gt;
LANGUAGE)]], and [[Usable Req 5|USABLE-5 (ACCESSIBILITY)]] for guidance on the usability of such mechanisms.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deletion” generally refers to removal of the data from availability. Data disposal, its complete&lt;br /&gt;
removal from the complying entity&#039;s own systems and control, may depend on the legal and&lt;br /&gt;
contractual requirements applicable to the data; see [[Privacy Req 14|PRIVACY-14 (DATA RETENTION AND DISPOSAL)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Intermediaries (third parties) may not have direct control over the information that flows through their systems, but should deploy mechanisms that support entity’s ability to conform to this Requirement. See [[Interop Req 6|INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY COMPLIANCE)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of&lt;br /&gt;
“intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability.&amp;quot; This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Pseudonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CHANGES|CHANGES]], [[IDEF Keywords CHOICE|CHOICE]], [[IDEF Keywords CONTROL|CONTROL]], [[IDEF Keywords CORRECTION|CORRECTION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords RETENTION|RETENTION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_6&amp;diff=5879</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 6</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_6&amp;diff=5879"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:41:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added roles to updated SG phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-6.    USAGE NOTICE ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST provide concise, meaningful, and timely communication to [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]]  describing how they collect, generate, use, transmit, and store [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of notice is to work toward informed consent from USERS: functional requirements should&lt;br /&gt;
work toward strategies for improving USERS&#039; understanding of their choices when engaging with&lt;br /&gt;
services. Strategies include layered approaches, just-in-time notice, and other examples that can&lt;br /&gt;
illustrate effective types of notice mechanism alternatives to privacy policies. In the case of material&lt;br /&gt;
changes to the service, entities shall provide clear and conspicuous descriptions of the changes and&lt;br /&gt;
their impacts on USERS in advance of the change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Consent” alone should not be used to mitigate privacy risks created by technical architecture or&lt;br /&gt;
design, such as to mitigate risks that individuals could not be reasonably expected to be able to assess;&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Privacy Req 5|PRIVACY-5 (DATA AGGREGATION RISK)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirements [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]] on&lt;br /&gt;
the application of limitations to, and scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also the [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0#Usability|IDESG Usability Requirements]] (USABLE-1 through USABLE-7) regarding the clarity of&lt;br /&gt;
notices given to USERS and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Kantara Consent Receipt is now available (January 2018) in draft form at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wg-infosharing/553qIdgaq0o&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords NOTICE|NOTICE]], [[IDEF Keywords POLICIES|POLICIES]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_5&amp;diff=5859</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_5&amp;diff=5859"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:40:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: added roles for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-5.    DATA AGGREGATION RISK ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST assess the privacy risk of aggregating [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]], in systems and processes where it is collected, generated, used, transmitted, or stored, and wherever feasible, MUST design and operate their systems and processes to minimize that risk.   Entities MUST assess and limit linkages of personal information across multiple transactions without the [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USER]]&#039;s explicit consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]], and [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collection of personal information from repeated data transactions, which can be associated to form&lt;br /&gt;
a larger body of knowledge about individuals, may increase their privacy risk. For example: An Identity&lt;br /&gt;
Provider’s ability to facilitate transactions between a user and multiple relying parties may give the&lt;br /&gt;
Identity Provider privileged insights into the users’ behavior. Such information is the result of the&lt;br /&gt;
Identity Provider’s ability to link user interactions across transactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Users’ explicit consent” alone should not be used to mitigate privacy risks created by technical&lt;br /&gt;
architecture or design, such as to mitigate risks that individuals could not be reasonably expected to be&lt;br /&gt;
able to assess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirements [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]] on&lt;br /&gt;
the application of limitations to, and scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 5 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords AGGREGATION|AGGREGATION]], [[IDEF Keywords CONSENT|CONSENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_4&amp;diff=5841</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 4</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_4&amp;diff=5841"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:39:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: updated SG phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-4.    CREDENTIAL LIMITATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST NOT request [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]]’ credentials unless necessary for the transaction and then only as appropriate to the risk associated with the transaction or to the risks to the parties associated with the transaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Intermediaries may not have a direct relationship with individuals whose data moves through their systems,&lt;br /&gt;
but should facilitate endpoints&#039; ability to conform to this Requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of “intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability.&amp;quot; This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Psuedonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Requirements [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] and [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]] on the application of limitations to, and scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 4 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords CREDENTIAL|CREDENTIAL]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]], [[IDEF Keywords RISK|RISK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5824</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5824"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:36:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-3.    ATTRIBUTE MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities requesting [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attributes]] MUST evaluate the need to collect specific attributes in a transaction, as opposed to claims regarding those attributes.  Wherever feasible, entities MUST collect, generate, use, transmit, and store claims about [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] rather than attributes.   Wherever feasible, attributes MUST be transmitted as claims, and transmitted credentials and identities MUST be bound to claims instead of actual attribute values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Where feasible, Identity Providers (and any other entities releasing attributes) should provide the&lt;br /&gt;
opportunity for attributes to be released as claims as well as detailed attributes; see also [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1&lt;br /&gt;
(DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on granularity of requests to support data minimization by requesters, generally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute providers may be required by their own legal or business processes to collect and store, although&lt;br /&gt;
not necessarily transmit, attributes in their attribute form, in which case significant alteration or&lt;br /&gt;
filtering may be required when that data is re-used or transmitted to others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, an attribute could be a birth date and a claim could be “old enough to buy alcohol beverage in the state of WA”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 3 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ATTRIBUTES|ATTRIBUTE]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5823</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_3&amp;diff=5823"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:35:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: Added SG and Roles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-3.    ATTRIBUTE MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities requesting [[IDEF Glossary ATTRIBUTES|attributes]] MUST evaluate the need to collect specific attributes in a transaction, as opposed to claims regarding those attributes.  Wherever feasible, entities MUST collect, generate, use, transmit, and store claims about [[IDEF Glossary USERS|USERS]] rather than attributes.   Wherever feasible, attributes MUST be transmitted as claims, and transmitted credentials and identities MUST be bound to claims instead of actual attribute values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Where feasible, Identity Providers (and any other entities releasing attributes) should provide the&lt;br /&gt;
opportunity for attributes to be released as claims as well as detailed attributes; see also [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1&lt;br /&gt;
(DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on granularity of requests to support data minimization by requesters, generally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attribute providers may be required by their own business processes to collect and store, although&lt;br /&gt;
not necessarily transmit, attributes in their attribute form, in which case significant alteration or&lt;br /&gt;
filtering may be required when that data is re-used or transmitted to others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, an attribute could be a birth date and a claim could be “old enough to buy alcohol beverage in the state of WA”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 3 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ATTRIBUTES|ATTRIBUTE]], [[IDEF Keywords IDENTIFIERS|IDENTIFIER]], [[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5805</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_2&amp;diff=5805"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:34:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: Added roles for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-2.    PURPOSE LIMITATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the use of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] that is collected, used, transmitted, or stored to the specified purposes of that transaction.  Persistent records of contracts, assurances, consent, or legal authority MUST be established by entities collecting, generating, using, transmitting, or storing personal information, so that the information consistently is used in the same manner originally specified and permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information&amp;quot;, see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]]. Entities should also assure that their data&lt;br /&gt;
controls reliably apply these limitations to their future actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also Requirement [[Privacy Req 1|PRIVACY-1 (DATA MINIMIZATION)]] on the application of limitations to, and&lt;br /&gt;
scope of, individual transactions and data exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice G|INTEROP-BP-G (RECOMMENDED LEGAL COMPLIANCE)]]&lt;br /&gt;
regarding limitations imposed by laws. Please note the applicability of best practice [[Interop Best Practice F|INTEROP-BP-F&lt;br /&gt;
(RECOMMENDED FEDERATION COMPLIANCE)]] and Requirement [[Interop Req 6|INTEROP-6 (THIRD-PARTY&lt;br /&gt;
COMPLIANCE)]] regarding limitations arising from the involvement of THIRD-PARTIES such as&lt;br /&gt;
intermediaries, similar service providers, or FEDERATIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/53/IDEF-Functional-Model-v1.0.pdf IDESG Functional Model] for definition of Transaction Intermediation for the scope of&lt;br /&gt;
“intermediaries.” The functional model describes Transaction Intermediation as “Processes and&lt;br /&gt;
procedures that limit linkages between transactions and facilitate credential portability. This includes&lt;br /&gt;
functions defined as “Blinding,” “Pseudonymization/Anonymization,” and “Exchange.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 2 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - [[IDEF Glossary RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5707</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5707"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:31:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: Added roles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 1 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Relying Parties &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5 - Credential Service Providers (where there is user interaction) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5706</id>
		<title>Privacy Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Privacy_Req_1&amp;diff=5706"/>
		<updated>2018-06-13T20:29:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE */  updated for phase II&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PRIVACY-1.    DATA MINIMIZATION ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST limit the collection, use, transmission and storage of [[IDEF Glossary PERSONAL INFORMATION|personal information]] to the minimum necessary to fulfill that transaction’s purpose and related legal requirements. Entities providing claims or attributes MUST NOT provide any more personal information than what is requested. Where feasible, [[IDEF Glossary IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY-PROVIDERS]] MUST provide technical mechanisms to accommodate information requests of variable granularity, to support data minimization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding &amp;quot;personal information,&amp;quot; see [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the collection, use and storage will apply to every transaction where user private information is exchanged. [Entities are encouraged to address this issue by design, before run time, by limiting or applying controls or filters to classes of data.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This requirement limiting the provisioning of personal information applies to the entire lifetime of data on the entity’s site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boundaries of a TRANSACTION between an entity and a user are defined during the interchange where the user is identified to the entity (for example from signin to signout of the user.) See [[Privacy Req 2|PRIVACY-2 (PURPOSE LIMITATION)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Privacy Req 1 Supplemental Guidance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Further reference materials to aid organizations interested in conforming to these Requirements can be found at the wiki page [[Supplemental Privacy Guidance]]; this has been archived at https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/56/Supplemental-Privacy-Guidance.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], [[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords LIMITATION|LIMITATION]], [[IDEF Keywords MINIMIZATION|MINIMIZATION]], [[IDEF Keywords PRIVACY|PRIVACY]], [[IDEF Keywords PURPOSE|PURPOSE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_2&amp;diff=9475</id>
		<title>Usable Req 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_2&amp;diff=9475"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T17:10:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* APPLIES TO ROLES */ syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-2.    USABILITY ASSESSMENT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST assess the usability of the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they conduct in [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Entities may satisfy this Requirement by confirming that they have conducted a usability assessment&lt;br /&gt;
of their digital identity management functions. Other Requirements and best practices in this set&lt;br /&gt;
address their duty to mitigate issues identified in that assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[User Experience Guidelines Metrics|UXC Guidelines and Metrics]] page. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/58/User-Experience-Guidelines-Metrics.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model ATTRIBUTE PROVIDERS|ATTRIBUTE PROVIDERS]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIARIES|INTERMEDIARIES]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_2&amp;diff=9474</id>
		<title>Usable Req 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_2&amp;diff=9474"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T17:09:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: Added roles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-2.    USABILITY ASSESSMENT ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities MUST assess the usability of the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they conduct in [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
Entities may satisfy this Requirement by confirming that they have conducted a usability assessment&lt;br /&gt;
of their digital identity management functions. Other Requirements and best practices in this set&lt;br /&gt;
address their duty to mitigate issues identified in that assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[User Experience Guidelines Metrics|UXC Guidelines and Metrics]] page. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/58/User-Experience-Guidelines-Metrics.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model IDENTITY PROVIDERS|IDENTITY PROVIDERS]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model ATTRIBUTE PROVIDERS|ATTRIBUTE PROVIDERS]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIARIES|INTERMEDIARIES]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9465</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9465"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:31:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* APPLIES TO ROLES */ syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model RELYING PARTIES|RELYING PARTIES]], &lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9464</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9464"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:30:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* APPLIES TO ROLES */  syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[RELYING PARTIES] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9463</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9463"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:24:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* APPLIES TO roles */  syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ROLES ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Relying Parties &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9462</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9462"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: Continued updates from UXC 1.1 changes 12/5/2107&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO roles ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1 - Relying Parties &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2 - Identity Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3 - Attribute Providers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 – Intermediaries &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9461</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9461"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:16:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE */ syntax&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9460</id>
		<title>Usable Req 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Usable_Req_1&amp;diff=9460"/>
		<updated>2018-05-21T13:16:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE */  Updated from UXC changes 12/5/2017&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; Back to [[Baseline_Functional_Requirements_v1.0|Baseline Functional Requirements Index]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USABLE-1.    USABILITY PRACTICES ==&lt;br /&gt;
Entities conducting [[IDEF Glossary DIGITAL IDENTITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS|digital identity management functions]] MUST apply user-centric design, and industry-accepted appropriate usability guidelines and practices, to the communications, interfaces, policies, data transactions, and end-to-end processes they offer, and remediate significant defects identified by their usability assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE ===&lt;br /&gt;
All user experience in a digital identity management role will conform to this requirement and other USABLE requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;user-centric&amp;quot; design is a key tenet and requirement of the IDESG founding document: the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “user-centric” permeates the NSTIC Strategy (now stored at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf) and the IDESG principles, dated April 15, 2011. This term is further described in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] and is a common term in the User Experience domain. Besides those items related to security, privacy and interoperability, these UX items are part of the strategy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Transparency, the user understands the data collected and how it will be used&lt;br /&gt;
•	Reduced Cognitive Load on the User, minimize the number of authentication factors, like passwords.&lt;br /&gt;
•	Easy to Use by automating the user’s ability to know and change data held about them.&lt;br /&gt;
•	Improve confidence by showing users that web sites are part of a trusted framework.&lt;br /&gt;
•	Choice to present alternative identifiers or authentication servers to authorize access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== REFERENCES ===&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC resources|UXC Resources]] page for examples of non-normative UX practices. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at:&lt;br /&gt;
https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/60/UXC-Resources.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consult the [[UXC Dictionary]] page for examples of UXC definitions of terms in these&lt;br /&gt;
requirements and supplemental guidelines, in addition to those provided in [[APPENDIX_A-Defined_Terms|Appendix A]] to this&lt;br /&gt;
document. An archived version as of October 2015 is stored at: https://workspace.idesg.org/kws/public/download.php/59/UXC-Dictionary.docx&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== APPLIES TO ACTIVITIES ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model REGISTRATION|REGISTRATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model CREDENTIALING|CREDENTIALING]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHENTICATION|AUTHENTICATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model AUTHORIZATION|AUTHORIZATION]], &lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Functional Model INTERMEDIATION|INTERMEDIATION]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== KEYWORDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[IDEF Keywords ASSESSMENT|ASSESSMENT]], [[IDEF Keywords DESIGN|DESIGN]], [[IDEF Keywords REMEDIATION|REMEDIATION]], [[IDEF Keywords USABILITY|USABILITY]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Links:   [[SALS]]  |  [[Baseline Functional Requirements v1.0]]  |  [[Glossary]]  |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=UXC_resources&amp;diff=9157</id>
		<title>UXC resources</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=UXC_resources&amp;diff=9157"/>
		<updated>2018-04-11T20:05:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Usability Studies in Privacy, Security, Identity, etc. */  fixed syntax error&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Back to: [[User_Experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The User Experience Committee Resource Catalogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Catalogue includes resources we believe may be helpful, though we do not endorse them now or as they change in the future, as we do not control these resources. &lt;br /&gt;
They are simply listed for reference in order to share resources with others less familiar with UX and Usability discipline. These cited references are here for illustrative purposes and are not meant to be prescriptive; they should be used based upon what fits particular circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX Best Practices ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://userexperiencedesigns.com/ Above The Fold&#039;s 50 UX Best Practices]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_evaluation Heuristic Evaluation]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.usability.gov Usability.gov]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.measuringu.com/blog/ux-benchmarks.php MeasuringU&#039;s 10 Benchmarks For User Experience Metrics]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ Nielsen Norman Group Articles]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX Authors, Books, and their Websites ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.jnd.org/ Don Norman: Designing for People]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.darrouzet-nardi.net/bonnie/ Bonnie Nardi]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.nngroup.com/ Jakob Nielsen]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/main_bio.html Helen Nissenbaum&#039;s Privacy By Design work]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.measuringux.com Tom Tullis and Bill Albert, Measuring The User Experience] -- many more great UX resources are listed on their site&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX and Usability Organizations ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://iainstitute.org Information Architecture Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.interaction-design.org/ Interaction Design Foundation]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://uxpa.org User Experience Professional Association]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;amp;gid=72842 UX group at LinkedIn (80k UX Professionals)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX Periodicals ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.boxesandarrows.com Boxes and Arrows]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.interaction-design.org/books/hci.html Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://journalofia.org Journal of Information Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.uxmatters.com UX Matters]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX Projects ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://iainstitute.org/library/ IA Library]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://interactiondesign.org Interaction Design Foundation Encyclopedia]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/enterprise/products-and-technologies/mdop/ue-v.aspx Microsoft User Experience Virtualization for Windows Enterprise]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.oracle.com/ux Oracle UX Project]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice_User_Experience The User Experience Project]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.usabilitybok.org/ UXPA: Usability Body of Knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Government UX Resources===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== United States ====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.usability.gov Usability.gov]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/benefits-of-ucd.html Usability.gov - What and Why: Benefits of User Centered Design]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://playbook.cio.gov/ U.S. Digital Service Digital Playbook]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.usability.gov/sites/default/files/documents/guidelines_book.pdf U.S. General Services Administration: Research-Based Web Design &amp;amp; Usability Guidelines]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== United Kingdom ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.gov.uk/design-principles UK Government Digital Services Design Principles]&lt;br /&gt;
UK Government Services Design Manual includes standards and user evaluation from planning, initial design, alpha/beta releases and ongoing development&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/270964/GPG_43_RSDOPS_issue_1.1_Dec-2012.pdf UK GDS Good Practice Guide: Requirements for Secure Delivery of Online Public Services] - Chapter 2 and 3 addresses user expectations&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/270969/GPG_43_RSDOPS_Annex_A__issue_1.1_Dec_2012.pdf UK GDS Good Practice Guide: Annex A: Stakeholder Expectations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== European Union ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.usabilitynet.org/home.htm Usabilitynet.org] (EU Funded guidelines)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== British Columbia ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/about-gov-bc-ca/citizen-centric/ux-toolbox UX Toolbox: Better Web for Citizens]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== UX &amp;amp; Accessibility ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards About the Section 508 Standards] (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.section508.gov/best-practices Section 508 Best Practices] (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/about-the-bc-government/accessibility/accessibility-2024 Accessibility 2024] (British Columbia, Canada)&lt;br /&gt;
* [ISO 9241 (2010) &amp;quot;Human-centered design processes for interactive systems&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [ISO/IEC 40500 (2012) Information technology]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.hhs.gov/web/section-508/compliance-and-remediation/framework/index.html Remediation Framework] (US HHS)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Usability Guidance for Identity Services ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ATxHnQzVftlgtK_Omsjq2LgK4SMnoRY1JyawKVYK-Lg IDEF Registry User Research Methodology] (Includes sample user test script)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Identity_Design_Patterns IDESG Identity Design Patterns]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/irm/Home Kantara: The Design Principles of Relationship Management V1.0 Report] (identifies design principles for identity management - possible resource for prescriptive guidance)&lt;br /&gt;
*  [https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/69273830/Kantara%20Initiative%20IRM%20Laws%20of%20Relationship%20Final%20Report%20v1.0.pdf?version=1&amp;amp;modificationDate=1425408854000&amp;amp;api=v2 Kantara IRM Laws of Relationship: Final Report v1.0] (PDF)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/01_5-paper.pdf A Comparative Usability Study of Two-Factor Authentication]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8080.pdf NIST Interagency Report (NISTIR) 8080, Usability and Security Considerations for Public Safety Mobile Authentication]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Usability Studies in Privacy, Security, Identity, etc. ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kolter, Jan Paul, [https://www.ics.uci.edu/~kobsa/phds/kolter.pdf User-Centric Privacy – A Usable and Provider-Independent Privacy Infrastructure]. Dissertation, University of Regensburg]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sundar et al. [https://networkedprivacy2016.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/sundar-et-al-final_chi-pbd-workshop-161.pdf Six Ways to enact Privacy by Design: Cognitive Heuristics that predict Users’ Online Information Disclosure]. Conference Paper. CHI 2016, May 7 - 12, 2016, San Jose, CA. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.internetsociety.org/events/ndss-symposium-2016/usable-security-usec-workshop-programme 2016 Usable Security (USEC), Internet Society (papers on usability in security products)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.internetsociety.org/events/ndss-symposium-2015/ndss-2015-usec-programmesion3 2015 Usable Security (USEC), Internet Society (papers on usability in security products)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, Y.D., and Emurian, H.H. [http://userpages.umbc.edu/~emurian/cv/TrustCHB.pdf An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications]. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 2005:105-125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Submitting a Resource to the UXC ===&lt;br /&gt;
If you have a resource link that you would like considered for this page, please submit your request with subject line: UXC Resource Page suggestion &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
to:  help@idesg.org or join our UXC group. Information about joining IDESG is here: http://www.idesg.org/Membership/Become-a-Member. Join the org, sign the IPR&lt;br /&gt;
and then join the UXC maillist which will be available in the &#039;members only&#039; section.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Trust_Federation_Membership_Validation&amp;diff=8337</id>
		<title>Trust Federation Membership Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Trust_Federation_Membership_Validation&amp;diff=8337"/>
		<updated>2017-10-06T21:21:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */ for context&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document lays out a method for doing get-requests for searching the IDEF Registry database. Searches can be done on services, companies, and service category. The method describes how people can determine the current membership of another digital entity in a Trust Framework, and find services in categories that matter to them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods could be used together with a recommendation for adoption by the IDEF registry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several [[Trust Frameworks]] exist to enable digital entities to establish the policies used by the digital entity are in conformance with established standards, regulations and commonly accepted policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Trust&#039;&#039;&#039; can be based on two sources, past behavior by the entity, or membership of the entity in a group whose membership has shown that they are trustworthy. The IDESG ecosystem seeks to provide trust by membership of digital entities in Trust Frameworks. This document describes how one digital entity can learn that some other digital entity is currently a member of a framework that they trust to provide and enforce policies that lead to trustworthy behavior. The value of the mark proving evidence of membership will only be valuable to the extent that all of the members show that they deserve the trust that the mark asserts. In this paper it is assumed that some other technology is used to create a trusted identifier of each digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;Trust Framework&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined by Kantara to be &amp;quot;a complete set of contracts, regulations or commitments that enable participating actors to rely on certain assertions by other actors to fulfill their information security requirements.&amp;quot; In this document the objective is simply to allow two digital entities (actors) to satisfy each other as to the membership of the other in a mutually acceptable trust framework. The only user experience element discussed is a multiresolution mark or logo with URL that will enable the user to learn about proof of the authority of the digital entity to display the mark that correspond to the trust framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.idesg.org/The-ID-Ecosystem/Overview Identity Ecosystem]&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be an online community of users and digital entities that are bound by a common set of technologies, processes and policies, that is, by one or more Trust Frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As general rule, the membership validation is strictly between digital entities and the user is unaware of the activity which is typically hidden from the user. Some inevitable confusion arises when a unique digital identifier is conflated with a user understandable name for a digital entity. In particular there is no standard way for the RP to acquire display name of the IdP using dynamic registration. The only methods available today require static (manual) registration of the RP with the IdP. Since the user will always be the ultimate source of trust for activities in the digital realm, it is necessary that digital identities are not created with the specific intent to confuse trust decisions. It is understood that this is not an easy requirement to satisfy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be pointed out that the concept of a framework membership requirement creates a closed system. That is good for security, but somewhat at odds with interoperability. On the other hand it does make it easier for OpenID to be deployed in corporations or consortia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No widely accepted standard method exists for distinct digital entities in a trust framework to prove their conformance with the policy standards of the trust framework to each other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No widely accepted standard method exists for securely identifying digital entities or trust frameworks with a name that a user can use for a trust deciscion. The best that exists today is TLS [https://cabforum.org/extended-validation-2/ Extended Validation Certificates] which do tend to have a short host name. The user involvement in trust decisions does need to be described in any specification of trust frameworks. In some cases it is the guardian of the user that needs to be involved in the trust decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Solution==&lt;br /&gt;
Several potential solutions were considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_key_infrastructure Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)] depends on the existence of a chain of trust back to a root [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor Trust Anchor]. It would be possible for a Trust Framework to establish their own Trust Anchor and issue certificates. Creating a Certificate Authority for Trust Framework Membership is expensive but effective and well known. One deployed example of this method is the [https://www.openbanking.org.uk/ UK Open Banking] effort.&lt;br /&gt;
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Certificate_Status_Protocol Online Certificate Status Protocol] can be used to test the validity of a certificate without relying on the CRL of PKI. It could be the basis for trust framework membership validation. Using existing service provider certificates and providing some sort of online check of that cert with the Framework membership service would be less expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsover.htm Account Authority Digital Signature (AADS)] uses the public key technology without PKI.  Avoiding the expense of deploying X.509 certificates of PKI  would result in the lowest cost from Framework Membership Validation. Note that this method does not mean that PKI certificates are not acquired by members of the federation, only that the federation does not deploy its own PKI infrastructure. The following proposed solution for the IDEF is based on AADS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are some of the ways to establish trust, they all require the existence of a Trust Anchor at a well-know address of the Trust Framework. Note that TLS (HTTPS) is required before trust of digital entities can be considered.&lt;br /&gt;
#Use the URL of the digital entity to identify it. While the URL was not designed to be user friendly, many security schemes depend on the user understanding the importance of the URL as a unique identifier for a digital entity. Note the confusion created by conflating a user understandable name with a unique digital identifier. This method requires one of the following to be used as the digital entity&#039;s unique identifier:&lt;br /&gt;
##The host name. This is simple, generally human readable and contains no weird punctuation. Many browser users understand the meaning of this name, but there are attacks using non-ASCII characters that confuse users with names similar to ones that the users do trust. Note the confusion created by conflating a user understandable name with a unique digital identifier.&lt;br /&gt;
##The host name plus the port number. This is the method selected by the TLS standard. This appears to users of commercial sites as the same as the above choice since commercial sites use the default port number 443.&lt;br /&gt;
##The host name plus the port number plus the path. This is the method selected by the OpenID standards. It is very easy to confuse users with this choice.&lt;br /&gt;
#Use the public key of the SSL cert for the identity of the digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
#The service provider creates a name, potentially localized, by which it would like to be known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the service wants to use an email address as an identifier for the digital entity to enable the user to contact the manufacturer, that should be permitted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create a web site for the Trust Anchor that can be queried using some part of the identifier. This site should allow search terms and return all of the identifiers that match the query. This step is required for proving membership in a Trust Framework, but is optional for digital entities that just wish to self-assert their identifier and policies. In an ideal world the policies should be machine readable as well as user understandable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Proposed formats for keys and identifiers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Trust Anchor end point MUST respond to queries with a list of all members matching the query with a key and at least one identity. The format of the identity can be specified within the range listed below. The Trust Anchor or any service Provider would provide configuration information with a well-known URI (registered with the IETF) such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://idesg.org/.wellknown/idesg-configuration&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Trust Anchor MUST have a logo and associated URL describing the category of each member and the terms and conditions that are met to permit the display of the logo. The Trust Anchor SHOULD provide the logo in different resolutions as might be needed by member web sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Trust Anchor MUST provide all data attributes (claims) that are defined as mandatory by the Trust Framework. For example many trust frameworks will have levels of assurance or access that are assigned to members based on their role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The service provider MUST provide public keys in JWK Set format, such as the following 2048-bit RSA key:&lt;br /&gt;
 {&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;keys&amp;quot;: [&lt;br /&gt;
    {&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;alg&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;RS256&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;e&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;AQAB&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;n&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;o80vbR0ZfMhjZ...&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;kty&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;RSA&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;kid&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;rsa1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    }&lt;br /&gt;
  ]&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The service provider MAY provide public keys in X.509 format if the certificate template includes the identifier (DN) of the service provider and of the framework(s) that have certified it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The service Provider MUST associate their public keys with an identity that is either:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The URI without the scheme &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;(which could be either https:// or mailto://)&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The X.509 CN provided that is user-friendly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 A localized name of its own choosing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The service Provider MAY provide other identities, attributes and service documentation, such as URL pointers to policies and service terms of use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
POET Payload&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 {&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;scope&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;openid profile patient/*.read&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;software_id&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;4NRB1-0XZABZI9E6-5SM3R&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;redirect_uris&amp;quot;: [&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;quot;https://apps-dstu2.smarthealthit.org/cardiac-risk/&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
  ],&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;exp&amp;quot;: 1563564064,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;client_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://apps-dstu2.smarthealthit.org/cardiac-risk/&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;initiate_login_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://apps-dstu2.smarthealthit.org/cardiac-risk/launch.html&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;iat&amp;quot;: 1500492064,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;iss&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;endorsements.transparenthealth.org&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;client_name&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Cardiac Risk App&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;grant_types&amp;quot;: [&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;quot;authorization_code&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
  ],&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;token_endpoint_auth_method&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;client_secret_basic&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;logo_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://gallery.smarthealthit.org/img/apps/66.png&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Proposed Request Message===&lt;br /&gt;
All of the data provided by the registry is public and so any internet device can send a request query string which includes the response_type parameter which indicates HTML or JSON for human or machine readable format. If there is no query string the first 25 entries are returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the parameters that can be included in the query sting:&lt;br /&gt;
*response_type OPTIONAL currently defined values are HTML (the default) or JSON&lt;br /&gt;
*framework_category OPTIONAL selects the types of site sought.&lt;br /&gt;
*service_match OPTIONAL If strictly alphanumeric this is treated as &amp;quot;contains&amp;quot;. If any other characters are present it is treated as a &amp;quot;regex&amp;quot; on the name of the member. If absent all members are returned.&lt;br /&gt;
*company_match OPTIONAL If strictly alphanumeric this is treated as &amp;quot;contains&amp;quot;. If any other characters are present it is treated as a &amp;quot;regex&amp;quot; on the name of the member. If absent all members are returned.&lt;br /&gt;
*quantity OPTIONAL numeric. If absent only the first 25 entries are returned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://idefregistry.org/query?{querystring]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Federation Office===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
idefregistry of metadata statement from the IDESG about itself at address &amp;quot;https://idesg.org/fed&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
IDESG is operating as Federation Operator (FO)&lt;br /&gt;
according to the [http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0.html OpenID Connect Federation 1.0]. It is the [[Trust Anchor]] for the signature of any signed JWT relating to the framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 {&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;framework_category&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;idesg fo&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;contacts&amp;quot;: [&amp;quot;rp_helpdesk@idefregistry.org&amp;quot;],&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;redirect_uris&amp;quot;: [&amp;quot;https://idefregistry.org/rp1&amp;quot;],&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;signing_keys_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://idefregistry.org/jwks&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;logo_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://idefregistry.org/logo.jpg&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;policy_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://idefregistry.org/policy.html&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;tos_uri&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;https://idefregistry.org/tos.html&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
idefregistry of metadata statement about a registrant &amp;quot;http://idesg-rp.azurewebsites.net/&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 {&lt;br /&gt;
   &amp;quot;federation_usage&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;idesg relying_party&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
but now we want to publish a list of compliant parties according the search criteria&lt;br /&gt;
show what a url would be and the html vs. json output in response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this needs to be compared to UK open banking security guidence as well&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Appendix - definitions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====signing_keys====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. (I think we can leave this out) A JSON Web Key Set (JWKS) representing the public part of the entity&#039;s signing keys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The keys that can be found here or at signing_keys_uri must not be confused with the keys that an OIDC entity is using for Authorization/AccessToken/RefreshToken/UserInfo requests and responses. Those keys are found at jwks_uri or in the case of client registration also possibly as values to jwks. The signing keys are used to sign metadata statements and can also be used by an OP to sign a client registration request response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====signing_keys_uri====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. (perhaps required - see signed jwks below) Location where a JWKS representing the public part of the entity&#039;s signing keys can be found. SHOULD return the Content-Type &amp;quot;application/jose&amp;quot; to indicate that the JWKS is in the form of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) using the JWS Compact Serialization. The signing key used to sign the JWKS belongs to the immediate superior. That is, the entity that signs this entity&#039;s metadata statement also signs the JWKS stored at signing_keys_uri.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====metadata_statements====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. JSON object where the names are federation identifiers and the values a signed JSON documents containing compounded metadata statements rooted in that federation. There is one value per name. &lt;br /&gt;
====metadata_statement_uris====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. JSON object where the names are the federation identifiers and the values are URLs pointing to a compounded metadata statement (CMS) rooted in that federation. Each URL points to just one CMS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====service_documentation====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL.  URL of a page containing human-readable information that developers might want or need to know when using a server.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====signed_jwks_uri====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. (I suggest making this required) This is the signed version of the jwks_uri parameter defined in OpenID Connect Dynamic Client Registration 1.0. SHOULD return the Content-Type &amp;quot;application/jose&amp;quot; to indicate that the JWKS is in the form of a JWS using the JWS Compact Serialization. The key used to sign the JWKS can be found in signing_keys or signing_keys_uri. &lt;br /&gt;
====federation_usage====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OPTIONAL. Metadata statements that are used in different contexts will contain different parameters. For example, information that an OP publishes about itself is not the same as what an RP wants to register. This together with the differences in the roles between an OP and an RP, means that policies for RPs will not be the same as for OPs. There is therefore a need for tagging the Metadata statement such that a Metadata statement intended to be used in one context cannot be used in another. This is the reason for the federation_usage parameter. This parameter can be used to limit the usage to a specific context. The federation_usage value is a case sensitive string. The values specified in the OpenID document are &#039;discovery&#039;, &#039;registration&#039; and &#039;response&#039;. In the IDESG federation the context is not defined, only the roles for which certification is granted. The corresponding contexts are: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
1 discovery&lt;br /&gt;
 Provider Information Discovery Response&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
2 registration&lt;br /&gt;
 Client Registration Request&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3 response&lt;br /&gt;
 Client Registration Request response&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The following values are defined for IDESG.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4 idesg&lt;br /&gt;
 Membership in IDESG Trust Framework&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5 relying_party or client&lt;br /&gt;
 certified as a Relying Party that is able to get external authentications (if they use internal authentication they must get certified as authentication as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 identifier_provider or authentication&lt;br /&gt;
 certified as a Identity Provider, or as the source of and identifier used in authentication (like mailto:) as well as the source of the subject ID (sub).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7 authorization&lt;br /&gt;
  provides access to user private information (or other resources) must include agreement to acquire user consent to release user information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8 attribute_provider or user_info&lt;br /&gt;
 certified as an Attribute Provider, or in OpenID terms as a user_info endpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9 intermediary&lt;br /&gt;
  basically any function requiring certification that is not otherwise covered, for example a Privacy Enhancing Technology Provider or a federation server.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/PRE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination with other groups==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0.html OpenID Connect Federation 1.0] and the references in that document define most of the terms used in the Federation Office section above.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7519 JSON Web Token] (JWT) IETF RFC 7519 is to be used as the format for the metadata messages described above.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7517 JSON Web Key] (JWK) IETF RFC 7515 is to be used for the key set.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Basic interactions in a single Trust Framework]] was an early start at building a standard set of interactions between digital entities involved in a Trust Framework.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://fixs.org Federation for Identity and Cross-Credentialing Systems (FiXs)] works for standardization within the U. S. Federal government. It has no specific protocols of its own.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://tscp.org Transglobal Secure Collaboration Program] was originally formed to use U. S. DoD PIV smart cards to establish trusted connections among the DoD Contractors. It has since developed a [https://www.nist.gov/itl/tig/pilot-projects#summaries NIST pilot program] to show how that trusted connection can be expanded beyond their narrow scope for use with financial institutions.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Trust Frameworks Catalog]] lists InCommon, Kantara and potentially other trust frameworks recognized by the IDESG.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#ClaimsLanguagesAndScripts Core OpenID Connect spec] contains information on localization of names.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html OpenID Connect Discovery Document] contains other information that could be reported by the Trust Anchor to help understand the scope of their work.&lt;br /&gt;
   &amp;quot;service_documentation&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
     &amp;quot;http://server.example.com/connect/service_documentation.html&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
   &amp;quot;ui_locales_supported&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
     [&amp;quot;en-US&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;en-GB&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;en-CA&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;fr-FR&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;fr-CA&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a draft [http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0.html federation document] of the AB/Connect group of the OpenID that has useful components, but some unacceptable requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [http://openid.net/wordpress-content/uploads/2014/04/draft-mobile-registration-01.html mobile software registration] profile from OpenID does show the way to provide information about the client (RP) software, but even it has not defined a friendly name that a user could understand.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://github.com/TransparentHealth/poet Pre Oauth Entity Trust]  a means to represent third-party application endorsement for health care applications. POET’s goal is to help consumers distinguish between applications that have an endorsement versus applications that have no pedigree (i.e untrusted and could be malicious).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trust Framework]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:TFTM]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=User_Experience_Trust_Metrics&amp;diff=10163</id>
		<title>User Experience Trust Metrics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=User_Experience_Trust_Metrics&amp;diff=10163"/>
		<updated>2017-09-28T19:04:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Problem: How to Make IDEF Attractive to Relying Parties */ small syntax cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
User Research should enable measurement of the evolving trust that is enabled by the work of the IDESG and the IDEF registry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The requirements for this page are based on a TFTM presentation of October 2014 and are intended as input to the TFTM process. The following questions are taken from that presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
===What is the baseline?===&lt;br /&gt;
Improving the security, privacy, usability, and interoperability of everyday online transactions&lt;br /&gt;
===What benefits could the everyday consumer see if this baseline were established?===&lt;br /&gt;
e.g., reduced account compromise through increased use of multifactor authentication; greater user control through notice, consent requirements; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What we do know? (from the [[NSTIC Strategy]] Document)===&lt;br /&gt;
By making online transactions more trustworthy and enhancing consumers&#039; privacy, we &lt;br /&gt;
will prevent costly crime; we will give businesses and consumers new confidence; and we will foster &lt;br /&gt;
growth and innovation, online and across our economy — in some ways we can predict, and in other &lt;br /&gt;
ways we can scarcely imagine. Ultimately, that is the goal of the [[NSTIC Strategy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the process of building a IDEF Registry as the first of the IDESG Frameworks, potential users of the site have asked specifically what the benefits of joining such a framework might be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Our Statement of Trust===&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of any trust framework is a community of users and providers that will make every person or [[Digital Entity]] feel more secure that their privacy, safety and money is not likely to be compromised while operating within the framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is accomplished by:&lt;br /&gt;
#Verifying that every [[Digital Entity]] that is member of the Framework has agreed to follow the principles and rules of the Framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#Enabling any [[Digital Entity]] to be assured that they are communicating with other entities that are currently part of the framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#Ensuring that users can be authenticated by Identity Providers that will follow the user&#039;s consent when release any [[user Private Information]] to any other [[Digital Entity]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Knowing that when a user visits any web site ([[Relying Party]]); that site will honor the stipulations that the user places on the entity that holds their [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Problem: How to Make IDEF Attractive to Relying Parties==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common uptake problem in most introductory privacy initiatives is they stall when designers of web sites contend with innovative privacy requirements. The biggest challenges are faced by web sites that function as a [[Relying Party]] (RP) for identities or attributes provided by Identity or Attribute Providers. In spite of the very real advantage of &amp;quot;owning the customer relationship&amp;quot;, these RP web sites have decided to forgo the challenges of securely authenticating users, but they still desire to acquire the most [[User Private Information]] possible to further their business interests. In order to enhance user privacy in the ecosystem, trusted IdPs have required user consent to share identity attribute data with RPs, limiting their ability to generate revenue. This creates another challenge: what is the RPs incentive to function within an ecosystem that limits their access to [[User Private Information]]? And how do users asses RP requests for more information? Until users can assess the value of an RP as a trusted party that protects a user&#039;s privacy and liability, the RP&#039;s will have no incentive to comply with any ecosystem rules that both increase their costs and limit that access to [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the private sector, privacy is an individual choice and most of the time it is not valued or appreciated until it is lost or breached, or causes general frustration where some user&#039;s don&#039;t follow through with building the relationship or reluctantly provide the data because they have little choice. Only where there is a breach or misuse do users personally experience the loss as they try to reestablish their credentials and privacy. Case in point: try rebuilding a credit history once authenticated attributes have been compromised. Users need to educate themselves about privacy certifications, credentials and established third party relationships with a RP supporting functions and this is tedious and not practical. As market forces offer lip service to the importance of privacy and RPs, Governmental efforts to enforce privacy preserving methods and technologies impact the private sector and their relationship with regulated businesses that use Relying Parties. But until both government and market forces work in concert to drive adoption, privacy methods and technology uptake will be limited. Governmental efforts include direct regulatory action and allowing class action lawsuits via a legal process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The set of metrics provided here apply to how to assess the UXC&#039;s requirements (also called Usability Requirements in the documents) as they apply to the [http://idefregistry.org IDEF Registry]. The IDEF Registry is designed to understand how users embrace trustworthiness and the framework around privacy, security and interoperability, while being resilient when selecting web sites and identity products that serve their interests and meet their objectives on the web for both functionality and security of their money, data they may provide to an entity online, their reputation and their privacy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Metrics==&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the points where user experience can be measured to determine if the base line requirements are met. Note that the first metrics are for overall usability moving into the trust measurements that will indicate compliance of a particular implementation with the terms of the IDESG or of the Framework.&lt;br /&gt;
===How are UX metrics obtained===&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics are quantitative measures that can be tracked over time. They come from questions presented to user and from the evaluation of direct observations of users on particular sites. The Wikipedia entry on User Experience Evaluation (at this site [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_experience_evaluation]]) defines these terms: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;User experience (UX) evaluation&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;User experience assessment (UXA)&#039;&#039;&#039; refers to a collection of methods, skills and tools utilized to uncover how a person perceives a system (product, service, non-commercial item, or a combination of them) before, during and after interacting with it. It is non-trivial to assess user experience since user experience is subjective, context-dependent and dynamic over time.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the evaluation of the user is dependent on the specific UX presented to the user on a specific site, the broad measure of the success of the whole ecosystem will only be measurable when multiple sites supporting the IDESG ecosystem are widely available and questions about the overall experience are possible. In the meantime, specific implementations of web sites supporting the IDESG are encouraged. The metrics provider here should be able to act as a base set that would allow comparison between different researcher&#039;s results. A common base set of metrics would allow the UXC to use independently generated research reports in the compilation of an ecosystem wide report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(INSERT to flesh out questions) &lt;br /&gt;
Human Centered&lt;br /&gt;
Possibility-driven&lt;br /&gt;
Options-focused&lt;br /&gt;
Expect to be wrong (portfolio approach)&lt;br /&gt;
Iterative &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All measurements below (expect the verbatim data) should have a qualitative and quantitative ways to measure success from users. Follow up measurements should be included over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Measurements (Quantitative)===&lt;br /&gt;
# Can the user accomplish the task set out to accomplish? (A goal might be 90%, a minimum acceptable might be 60%)&lt;br /&gt;
# What is the System Usability Scale (John Brooke&#039;s SUS)&lt;br /&gt;
# It the Trustmark discoverable and self-describing. (90%, 70%)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user feel safer as a result of the appearance of the Trustmark. (99%, 80% of those answering in the affirmative above.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user feel that the site is safe overall? (the metric is a comparisons of the positives to the negatives.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user understand the necessity for a strong identity in protecting their money, their reputation and their privacy?&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user know whether the identity of the provider is strongly bound to a real-world, trusted entity?&lt;br /&gt;
# Collected verbatim responses used for site improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open question, does there need to be a separate list for a [[Relying Party]] and for an [[Identity Provider]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The System Usability Scale (Survey)===&lt;br /&gt;
The SUS is a 10 item questionnaire with 5 response options. &lt;br /&gt;
#I think that I would like to use this framework frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the framework unnecessarily complex.&lt;br /&gt;
#I thought the sites that adhere to the framework are easy to use.&lt;br /&gt;
#I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the various functions in this web site were well integrated.&lt;br /&gt;
#I thought there was too much inconsistency in this web site.&lt;br /&gt;
#I would imagine that most people would learn to use this framework very quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the framework was more trouble than it was worth.&lt;br /&gt;
#I felt very confident using web sites that display the framework logo.&lt;br /&gt;
#I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Guidelines of Behavior for Designing Surveys and Evaluating Results====&lt;br /&gt;
Usability researchers should adhere to IRB requirements for the treatment of users and user collected information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survey guidance &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. Consent to participate must be voluntarily given, as well as the option to decline participation in the survey. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. Individuals should be able to exit the survey at any time. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. Survey questions should be comprehendible by a wide audience.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4. Surveys should be concise and easy to answer. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5. Surveys should be open to all users to ensure the widest possible range of individual respondents. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
6. Surveys should include an introductory explanation of how the user&#039;s personal information and responses will be treated, what level confidentiality they can expect and links to privacy policy, trust frameworks and other policies that govern collection of personal information. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
7. Any results of surveys should be aggregated and depersonalized to protect the participant&#039;s privacy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
8. Results of the survey could be made available as long as privacy of participants can be insured by the system.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Interviews (Qualitative Research and Ethnographic Studies)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research generally involves direct in-person interviews with human subjects, and as such requires care with respect to personal information and user stories shared. NSTIC pilots are required to use formal academic IRB standards and certification, and generally erring on the side of personal information privacy and confidentiality is preferred when conducting direct interviews with subjects or collecting other personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research is conducted in order to gather in-depth information about the reasons subjects choose one path or method over another, understand systems one way verses another, etc. It is conducted in an effort to get at the deeper issues in a system, that cannot be understood just by reviewing usage logs or via survey data which rarely explains why or how people understand a system.  Additionally, often subjects develop work-arounds for systems that don&#039;t work, and it is through watching them work that the original problem the work-around is meant to solve becomes apparent. It is this understanding that often isn&#039;t quite clear to the subject that is often discovered through interviews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Guidelines of Behavior for Designing Qualitative Research====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research can be conducted in person, through journal entry, via group discussion and observations in personal settings. Due to the personal nature of this research, some guidelines are included below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Qualitative Research Guidelines:  http://www.qualres.org/ and Evaluative Criteria http://www.qualres.org/HomeEval-3664.html &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group http://cqim.cochrane.org/ &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards/other-resources-links&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.section508.gov/best-practices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trust]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=User_Experience_Trust_Metrics&amp;diff=10151</id>
		<title>User Experience Trust Metrics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=User_Experience_Trust_Metrics&amp;diff=10151"/>
		<updated>2017-09-26T17:04:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Problem */ rewrite&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
User Research should enable measurement of the evolving trust that is enabled by the work of the IDESG and the IDEF registry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The requirements for this page are based on a TFTM presentation of October 2014 and are intended as input to the TFTM process. The following questions are taken from that presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
===What is the baseline?===&lt;br /&gt;
Improving the security, privacy, usability, and interoperability of everyday online transactions&lt;br /&gt;
===What benefits could the everyday consumer see if this baseline were established?===&lt;br /&gt;
e.g., reduced account compromise through increased use of multifactor authentication; greater user control through notice, consent requirements; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What we do know? (from the [[NSTIC Strategy]] Document)===&lt;br /&gt;
By making online transactions more trustworthy and enhancing consumers&#039; privacy, we &lt;br /&gt;
will prevent costly crime; we will give businesses and consumers new confidence; and we will foster &lt;br /&gt;
growth and innovation, online and across our economy — in some ways we can predict, and in other &lt;br /&gt;
ways we can scarcely imagine. Ultimately, that is the goal of the [[NSTIC Strategy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the process of building a IDEF Registry as the first of the IDESG Frameworks, potential users of the site have asked specifically what the benefits of joining such a framework might be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Our Statement of Trust===&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of any trust framework is a community of users and providers that will make every person or [[Digital Entity]] feel more secure that their privacy, safety and money is not likely to be compromised while operating within the framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is accomplished by:&lt;br /&gt;
#Verifying that every [[Digital Entity]] that is member of the Framework has agreed to follow the principles and rules of the Framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#Enabling any [[Digital Entity]] to be assured that they are communicating with other entities that are currently part of the framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#Ensuring that users can be authenticated by Identity Providers that will follow the user&#039;s consent when release any [[user Private Information]] to any other [[Digital Entity]].&lt;br /&gt;
#Knowing that when a user visits any web site ([[Relying Party]]); that site will honor the stipulations that the user places on the entity that holds their [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Problem: How to Make IDEF Attractive to Relying Parties==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The uptake of any privacy initiative has always stalled at uptake of the privacy requirements by the [[Relying Party]]. The [[Relying Party]] needs to acquire customers and other users to attract business or ad revenue. Traditionally this has meant that either many Identity Providers (IDP) didn&#039;t want to also be Relying Parties, IE take other IDPs identities, and that entities wanted to show business growth and use via their &amp;quot;user numbers.&amp;quot; But in order that individuals gain more privacy in the system, through maintaining their identity information at a trusted IDP and then providing limited data to RPs, RPs have to be willing to take less information from individuals. What is the RPs incentive to function strictly as an RP? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until the customers and user decide that privacy is important to them, the [[Relying Party]] will always view privacy initiatives as a cost that has no benefit to them. And until RPs decide that having less data is better, because they hold less than can be hacked and stolen, and therefore have less liability while still being able to run their businesses effectively selling their real products (not individual&#039;s data), there will be fewer RPs. Additionally, before individuals both value privacy and have a choice that includes web sites that honor privacy, there will be no market forces to drive privacy, because they will not understand how to create more privacy and how to put pressure in markets to support RPs by providing them the individual&#039;s business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Governmental efforts to enforce privacy preserving methods and technologies will have some impact on [[Relying Party]] adoption, but until both government and market forces work in concert to drive adoption, privacy methods and technology uptake will be limited. Governmental efforts include direct regulatory action and supporting class action lawsuits via the legal process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The set of metrics provided here apply to how to asses the UXC&#039;s requirements as they apply to the [IDEF Registry|http://idefregistry.org]. The IDEF Registry is designed to understand how users see privacy, security and interoperability when selecting web sites and identity products that are most likely to serve their interests and meet their objectives on the web for both functionality and security of their money, data they may provide to an entity online, their reputation and their privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Metrics==&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the points where user experience can be measured to determine if the base line requirements are met. Note that the first metrics are for overall usability moving into the trust measurements that will indicate compliance of a particular implementation with the terms of the IDESG or of the Framework.&lt;br /&gt;
===How are UX metrics obtained===&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics are quantitative measures that can be tracked over time. They come from questions presented to user and from the evaluation of direct observations of users on particular sites. The Wikipedia entry on User Experience Evaluation (at this site [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_experience_evaluation]]) defines these terms: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;User experience (UX) evaluation&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;User experience assessment (UXA)&#039;&#039;&#039; refers to a collection of methods, skills and tools utilized to uncover how a person perceives a system (product, service, non-commercial item, or a combination of them) before, during and after interacting with it. It is non-trivial to assess user experience since user experience is subjective, context-dependent and dynamic over time.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the evaluation of the user is dependent on the specific UX presented to the user on a specific site, the broad measure of the success of the whole ecosystem will only be measurable when multiple sites supporting the IDESG ecosystem are widely available and questions about the overall experience are possible. In the meantime, specific implementations of web sites supporting the IDESG are encouraged. The metrics provider here should be able to act as a base set that would allow comparison between different researcher&#039;s results. A common base set of metrics would allow the UXC to use independently generated research reports in the compilation of an ecosystem wide report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(INSERT to flesh out questions) &lt;br /&gt;
Human Centered&lt;br /&gt;
Possibility-driven&lt;br /&gt;
Options-focused&lt;br /&gt;
Expect to be wrong (portfolio approach)&lt;br /&gt;
Iterative &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All measurements below (expect the verbatim data) should have a qualitative and quantitative ways to measure success from users. Follow up measurements should be included over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Measurements (Quantitative)===&lt;br /&gt;
# Can the user accomplish the task set out to accomplish? (A goal might be 90%, a minimum acceptable might be 60%)&lt;br /&gt;
# What is the System Usability Scale (John Brooke&#039;s SUS)&lt;br /&gt;
# It the Trustmark discoverable and self-describing. (90%, 70%)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user feel safer as a result of the appearance of the Trustmark. (99%, 80% of those answering in the affirmative above.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user feel that the site is safe overall? (the metric is a comparisons of the positives to the negatives.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user understand the necessity for a strong identity in protecting their money, their reputation and their privacy?&lt;br /&gt;
# Does the user know whether the identity of the provider is strongly bound to a real-world, trusted entity?&lt;br /&gt;
# Collected verbatim responses used for site improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open question, does there need to be a separate list for a [[Relying Party]] and for an [[Identity Provider]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The System Usability Scale (Survey)===&lt;br /&gt;
The SUS is a 10 item questionnaire with 5 response options. &lt;br /&gt;
#I think that I would like to use this framework frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the framework unnecessarily complex.&lt;br /&gt;
#I thought the sites that adhere to the framework are easy to use.&lt;br /&gt;
#I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this framework.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the various functions in this web site were well integrated.&lt;br /&gt;
#I thought there was too much inconsistency in this web site.&lt;br /&gt;
#I would imagine that most people would learn to use this framework very quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
#I found the framework was more trouble than it was worth.&lt;br /&gt;
#I felt very confident using web sites that display the framework logo.&lt;br /&gt;
#I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Guidelines of Behavior for Designing Surveys and Evaluating Results====&lt;br /&gt;
Usability researchers should adhere to IRB requirements for the treatment of users and user collected information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survey guidance &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. Consent to participate must be voluntarily given, as well as the option to decline participation in the survey. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. Individuals should be able to exit the survey at any time. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. Survey questions should be comprehendible by a wide audience.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4. Surveys should be concise and easy to answer. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
5. Surveys should be open to all users to ensure the widest possible range of individual respondents. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
6. Surveys should include an introductory explanation of how the user&#039;s personal information and responses will be treated, what level confidentiality they can expect and links to privacy policy, trust frameworks and other policies that govern collection of personal information. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
7. Any results of surveys should be aggregated and depersonalized to protect the participant&#039;s privacy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
8. Results of the survey could be made available as long as privacy of participants can be insured by the system.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Interviews (Qualitative Research and Ethnographic Studies)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research generally involves direct in-person interviews with human subjects, and as such requires care with respect to personal information and user stories shared. NSTIC pilots are required to use formal academic IRB standards and certification, and generally erring on the side of personal information privacy and confidentiality is preferred when conducting direct interviews with subjects or collecting other personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research is conducted in order to gather in-depth information about the reasons subjects choose one path or method over another, understand systems one way verses another, etc. It is conducted in an effort to get at the deeper issues in a system, that cannot be understood just by reviewing usage logs or via survey data which rarely explains why or how people understand a system.  Additionally, often subjects develop work-arounds for systems that don&#039;t work, and it is through watching them work that the original problem the work-around is meant to solve becomes apparent. It is this understanding that often isn&#039;t quite clear to the subject that is often discovered through interviews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Guidelines of Behavior for Designing Qualitative Research====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qualitative Research can be conducted in person, through journal entry, via group discussion and observations in personal settings. Due to the personal nature of this research, some guidelines are included below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Qualitative Research Guidelines:  http://www.qualres.org/ and Evaluative Criteria http://www.qualres.org/HomeEval-3664.html &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group http://cqim.cochrane.org/ &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards/other-resources-links&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.section508.gov/best-practices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trust]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3737</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3737"/>
		<updated>2017-09-05T17:00:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* The User Trust Experience */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[Identity Ecosystem]] will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or pseudonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
In order to control access to their personal information, users need a mental map connecting their personal information to the digital representation of their information held by a digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in a kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The User Trust Experience==&lt;br /&gt;
One key assumption of the IDESG is that users want better security, privacy and usability in their online experience. While users will agree that these bed rock principles of the IDESG are very important, all real-world experience shows that user are most interested in reducing the hassle that is created in the performance of simple tasks on the internet. If security and privacy increase the difficult in their performance of simple tasks, then they will work around any barriers that good security and privacy raise for them. It is not helpful for the IDESG rules to raise barriers, those rules must work to lower barrier and provide nearly seamless user experience that sill provides the security and privacy that users deserve. After all the greatest hassle for users is created when their security or privacy are breached. While interoperability is seldom raised as a user expectation, if it is missing then the user will also complain about the hassle involved in moving amount the sites that they wish to experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first point to understand in the creation of a good user experience is that users must have authentication sites that they can trust. Any site that authenticates users can impersonate the user as well. So the only area where IDESG can help the user is selecting an identifier provider (IdP) to do authentication and consent acquisition. If [[User recovery and redress]] is to be possible, the IdP must have multiple ways to contact and verify the user. There is little to be gained in trying to reduce the information given to an IdP except for those users that want to have alternate personas, also known as pseudonyms. Note that one very important pseudonym that users do expect is that provided to extremely sensitive information, like some confidential health tests. In those cases as [[Trusted Third Party]] is required, which is just another name for an IdP that provides access to user sensitive information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given all of the challenges of security and privacy what can the IDESG do to help create a good user experience on authentication to Relying Parties. Here the user&#039;s expectation of good experience should be conditioned to expect that a [[Relying Party]](RP) will never ask for authentication information directly, but use a trusted IdP to perform the authentication and consent acquisition with the user&#039;s best interests at the core of the service they provide. These sites need to be trusted by the user based on years of favorable user experience with them. When the RP allows the user to select an IdP that is in everyday use by the user, then there is likely to be no separate authentication user experience at all when returning to the RP. That is the ideal user experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3736</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3736"/>
		<updated>2017-09-05T16:41:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Problem Summary */ verbage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[Identity Ecosystem]] will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or pseudonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
In order to control access to their personal information, users need a mental map connecting their personal information to the digital representation of their information held by a digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in a kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The User Trust Experience==&lt;br /&gt;
One key assumption of the IDESG is that users want better security and privacy in their online experience. While users will agree that these bed rock principles of the IDESG are very important, all real-world experience shows that user are most interested in reducing the hassle that is created in the performance of simple tasks on the internet. If security and privacy increase the difficult in their performance of simple tasks, then they will work around any barriers that good security and privacy raise for them. It is not helpful for the IDESG rules to raise barriers, those rules must work to lower barrier and provide nearly seamless user experience that sill provides the security and privacy that users deserve. After all the greatest hassle for users is created when their security or privacy are breached. While interoperability is seldom raised as a user expectation, if it is missing then the user will also complain about the hassle involved in moving amount the sites that they wish to experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first point to understand in the creation of a good user experience is that users must have authentication sites that they can trust. Any site that authenticates users can impersonate the user as well. So the only area where IDESG can help the user select an identifier provider (IdP) to do authentication and consent acquisition. If [[User recovery and redress]] is to be possible, the IdP must have multiple ways to contact and verify the user. There is little to be gained in trying to reduce the information given to an IdP except for those users that want to have alternate personas, also known as pseudonyms. Note that one very important pseudonym that users do expect is that provided to extremely sensitive information, like some confidential health tests. In those cases as [[Trusted Third Party]] is required, which is just another name for an IdP that provides access to user sensitive information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given all of the challenges of security and privacy what can the IDESG do to help create a good user experience on authentication to Relying Parties. Here the user&#039;s expectation of good experience should be conditioned to expect that a [[Relying Party]](RP) will never ask for authentication information directly, but use a trusted IdP to perform the authentication and consent acquisition with the user&#039;s best interests at the core of the service they provide. These sites need to be trusted by the user based on years of favorable user experience with them. When the RP allows the user to select an IdP that is in everyday use by the user, then there is likely to be no separate authentication user experience at all when returning to the RP. That is the ideal user experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:User Experience]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3718</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3718"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:52:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */ fixed deep link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Identity identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or pseudonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
Users need map their desire to control identity information to the digital representation of themselves which is held by the digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in a kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3717</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3717"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:50:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Problem Summary */  added summary at top&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or pseudonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
Users need map their desire to control identity information to the digital representation of themselves which is held by the digital entity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in a kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3716</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3716"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:39:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */ refined language&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or pseudonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3715</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3715"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:36:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */  Added link to glossary and defined identity ecosystem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs. For our purposes, &amp;quot;identity ecosystem&amp;quot; means an inter-operable identity commonly used across identity systems, via the use of common standards used by identity providers and relying parties in order to create relationships that are understood, even if temporary or anonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3714</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3714"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:32:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3713</id>
		<title>Identity Modeling Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Identity_Modeling_Introduction&amp;diff=3713"/>
		<updated>2017-08-29T16:32:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mary Hodder: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Any successful [[https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php?title=Glossary | identity]] ecosystem will provide users with an understanding about how they control access to their own [[User Private Information]] which is used by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet to authorize access to resources that the user wants or needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*This modelling exercise is limited to one user using a browser or similar user agent interacting with any one [[Digital Entity]] which contains [[User Private Information]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In the IDESG and GDPR, the user has the right to know what data is held about them and to control the use of that data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Problem==&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Summary===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When a user approaches a GUI, he or she does two things: thinking and doing. For a smooth interaction between man and machine, the computer&#039;s &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; model (also the programmer&#039;s mental model) and the end user&#039;s mental model must align with each other in kind of mind-meld. In the end, any work that users do on their side of the interface manipulates the objects in the code. If the program provides accurate real-time feedback about how user manipulations affect program state, it reduces user errors and surprises. A good GUI provides this service. Using an interactive program is like being a doctor trying to navigate a probe through a patient&#039;s bronchial tubes: just as you can&#039;t see the objects in program memory, you can&#039;t see the actual probe in the patient&#039;s body. You need some external representation of the program structure, or of the bronchial probe, to guide your interaction with a program.&amp;quot; This is a direct quote from [http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html The DCI Architecture: A New Vision of Object-Oriented Programming].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical Solutions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since SmallTalk at Xerox Parc, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller Model–view–controller (MVC)] design pattern has been used by UX designers to give user control of data held on computer systems. The basic assumption is that data held about the user should be modeled in such a way that the user would be able to effectively interact with the data store. On a personal computer this model still works wonderfully. Where it breaks down is data models that must be accessible by many systems on an increasing globalized internetwork of computers. When there is more and one type of system accessing the data, a model is required that handles requests from a wide variety of computer systems with disparate needs. For such a widely accessibly model, some domain of applicability will cover a range of uses, many of which are not attached to any GUI. The domain model is so complex that users cannot be expected to create a mental model of the entire data structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recent identity models have been created around specific data structures held in computer systems with the MVC augmented with separate view-models for each user interaction page. While this allows the design of view models that the user should be able to understand, the separation into distinct view-models for each display does not provide the user with a consistent view of the data that is accessible to them for their information or control. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93viewmodel Model–view–viewmodel (MVVM)] works well with event driven systems, but a more user-centric identity model is needed to enable users to build a single mental model of their data held in cyberspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A New Model==&lt;br /&gt;
The new model proposed for IDESG is one that considers the data held by any [[Digital Entity]] from the user&#039;s perspective. In this sense it is like a consistent view-model, except that it is not bound to one data base schema, but to an abstract view that should allow a consistent user experience that will apply to any interaction that the user has with their [[User Private Information]] held by any [[Digital Entity]] on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This identity model can be considered to be an abstract view-model of [[User Private Information]]. Each designer needs to carefully create a real view-model for their own solution. The objective of this exercise is to provide a the overall framework that will be a paradigm that can be used to create the consistent internal user model of how their data is handled on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Coordination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Best Practices and Example for RP System]] provides an example data base schema to show one way that a Relying Party could implement a database schema to achieve the results desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model Overview]] provides a description of the model for business decision makers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Identity Model]] provides a description of the model for designers and program architects.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mary Hodder</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>