https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Alternate_Functional_ModelAlternate Functional Model - Revision history2026-05-11T02:11:29ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.38.4https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=Alternate_Functional_Model&diff=91&oldid=prevOmaerz: 3 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki2018-06-28T03:00:31Z<p>3 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Alternate Functional Model ==<br />
<br />
=== Commenter ===<br />
Anthony Nadalin<br />
<br />
=== Comment Content ===<br />
So I like the simplicity of the left hand side of [https://www.idecosystem.org/idesgwiki/images/c/cb/Functional_Model.pptx Functional Model Proposal] but the right had side is too detailed with associations that may or may not be had, like the intermediary as this could be done before the actual binding as the intermediary could be an attribute broker. Another case is that the RP will also need to set policy, so its not just the principle.<br />
<br />
So while not all the way thought out here is a alternative to simplify the associations:<br />
<br />
<br />
[[File:Functional Model (alt).png|frameless|left|Alternate Functional Model]]<br />
<br />
=== Comment Disposition ===<br />
For use by reviewer.</div>Omaerz