<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=September_17%2C_2014_Meeting_Page</id>
	<title>September 17, 2014 Meeting Page - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=September_17%2C_2014_Meeting_Page"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_17,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-16T14:45:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_17,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;diff=7036&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Omaerz: 2 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_17,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;diff=7036&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2018-06-28T04:04:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;2 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==SECURITY COMMITTEE / FUNCTIONAL MODEL PLENARY BREAKOUT MEETING NOTES==&lt;br /&gt;
Meeting Date: September 17, 2014 – Tampa Plenary&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Attendees&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*List will be documented.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Meeting Notes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Notes taken by Ryan Galluzzo&lt;br /&gt;
*Focus of the meeting will be on the Framework Plan and Strategic Plan&lt;br /&gt;
*If you would like to contribute standards for adoption, send the recommendation to the chair and leadership of the Standards Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike described the process for approval of the functional model:&lt;br /&gt;
**It is now a plenary document and out of the Security Committee’s hands. &lt;br /&gt;
**Kim will be accepting amendments to the document on Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
**Adam will be sending out a potential amendment for the committee to review, it is intended to address the health care committee’s concerns over accountability.&lt;br /&gt;
**The committee will review the proposed modification tonight and discuss tomorrow via list serve or during one of the meetings. &lt;br /&gt;
*Jack provided a high level overview of the framework plan. &lt;br /&gt;
*There was significant discussion around how standards and requirements relate, and this needs further clarification in the Framework Development plan.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jack also suggested taking the functional model and having the committee ensure it is consistent with the “plan” that they produced. &lt;br /&gt;
*Jack stated that the current requirements development approach in use by the committee is aligned with the Framework Dev Plan.&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaining approval of the standards adoption policy should be a high priority for the standards committee since all standards adoption is dependent upon having this in place; the Security Committee will still seek to recommend standards, but until the SAP is approved that will be a secondary priority to a (still a priority, Just not the top priority)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Omaerz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>