<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=September_18%2C_2014_Meeting_Page</id>
	<title>September 18, 2014 Meeting Page - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=September_18%2C_2014_Meeting_Page"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_18,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-16T14:37:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_18,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;diff=7043&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Omaerz: 2 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.idesg.org/index.php?title=September_18,_2014_Meeting_Page&amp;diff=7043&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2018-06-28T04:04:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;2 revisions imported: Initial Upload of old pages from IDESG Wiki&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==SECURITY COMMITTEE / FUNCTIONAL MODEL PLENARY BREAKOUT MEETINGS NOTES==&lt;br /&gt;
Meeting Date: September 18, 2014 – Tampa Plenary&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Attendees&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*List will be documented.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Meeting Notes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Notes taken by Ryan Galluzzo&lt;br /&gt;
*Priorities for the meeting will include discussion of a potential amendment to the FM to support the Health Care committee’s request for a stronger focus on accountability, discuss any framework development plan items, discuss the interaction model, discuss work-planning and timelines. &lt;br /&gt;
*The group discussed pilot input which will be provided by participation in the committees as well as through a group of pilots that meet each week and provide input. Colin Soutar and Joe Stuntz are providing.&lt;br /&gt;
*The group discussed and approved the amendment to the Functional Model.&lt;br /&gt;
*Seetharama presented on his interaction model; there were several suggestions made by members of the committee:&lt;br /&gt;
**Relationship to the functional model and requirements should be clarified&lt;br /&gt;
**Target audience should be made clearer&lt;br /&gt;
**Make it clearer that this could be used to both help generate requirements, communicate them, and refine them&lt;br /&gt;
*Adam walked through his presentation on the framework development plan and the strategic plan&lt;br /&gt;
**The committee was in agreement that neither plan should impact their priorities&lt;br /&gt;
**The committee suggested that there should be an established mechanism for sharing information about requirements development between the committees; this will be a request of the committee presented during the report out this afternoon&lt;br /&gt;
**The committee would like input from the framework development plan team on what is meant by “baseline;” the committee should still decide what is in and what is not, but they would like some insight from leadership to help frame their own conversations&lt;br /&gt;
**There was a suggestion that benchmarking could be done to try to set the bar for initial requirements—also, what are services doing “post hack” to improve their practices&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Omaerz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>