State Issued ID for Healthcare - Revision history

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2021-01-07T01:30:06Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 7 January 2021
Line 84:		Line 84:
	# Is fraud reduction a part of the working group's remit.		# Is fraud reduction a part of the working group's remit.
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs ~~from~~ those do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs as those do have legal status in many cases.

	==References==		==References==

Tomjones: /* References */

2021-01-05T23:09:51Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 5 January 2021
Line 97:		Line 97:
	[[Category:Identifier]]		[[Category:Identifier]]
	[[Category:Use Cases]]		[[Category:Use Cases]]
			[[Category:Vulnerable Populations]]

Tomjones: /* Existing Experiences */

2020-12-20T03:26:47Z

Existing Experiences

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 20 December 2020
Line 65:		Line 65:
	* Several states and app developers have created "driver's license apps". Two states (CO & LA) appear to have working systems in place prior to the completion of the ISO standard.		* Several states and app developers have created "driver's license apps". Two states (CO & LA) appear to have working systems in place prior to the completion of the ISO standard.
	* It appears that the trend is for some well-established identifier supplier to offer a turn-key solution to states that comes with a "wallet" that only handles the one credential.		* It appears that the trend is for some well-established identifier supplier to offer a turn-key solution to states that comes with a "wallet" that only handles the one credential.
	* In LA there is also an app "Healthy Louisiana" that handles Medicaid or LaCHIP enrollment. There appears to be no synergy between this and the "LA Wallet".app.		* In LA there is also an app "Healthy Louisiana" that handles Medicaid or LaCHIP enrollment. There appears to be no synergy between this and the "LA Wallet" app.
	* Interoperability apparently has not even been addressed, but the state DMVs have not yet provided any real data on their implementations.		* Interoperability apparently has not even been addressed, but the state DMVs have not yet provided any real data on their implementations.

Tomjones at 18:39, 19 December 2020

2020-12-19T18:39:57Z

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 Tertiary Scenario:
 # The patient's immunization status can be included for building or travel access.
 ==Problems==
@@ Line 74: / Line 85: @@
 # How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)
 # Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.
 ==References==

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-18T00:12:48Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 18 December 2020
Line 68:		Line 68:
	# Who determines what data from the ID card is sent to the EHR? (eg. the healthcare community specs or explicit user consent)?		# Who determines what data from the ID card is sent to the EHR? (eg. the healthcare community specs or explicit user consent)?
	# Patient consent is not yet well described. It is suggested that a taxonomy of categories for patients to select might be a good next step.		# Patient consent is not yet well described. It is suggested that a taxonomy of categories for patients to select might be a good next step.
	# Is the state issued (eg driver's license) ID number included in any way?		# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.
	# Is a picture required in all cases.		# Is the state issued (eg driver's license) ID number included in any way? (Seems to be yes In most cases.)
	# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.		# Is a picture required in all cases.(For example religious objections to taking a picture.)
			# Is fraud reduction a part of the working group's remit.
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.
	~~# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.~~

	==Outcome==		==Outcome==

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-18T00:09:55Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 18 December 2020
Line 71:		Line 71:
	# Is a picture required in all cases.		# Is a picture required in all cases.
	# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.		# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break down is under 16 and under 21.)		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break-down is under 16 and under 21.)
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.
	# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.		# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-18T00:09:38Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 18 December 2020
Line 71:		Line 71:
	# Is a picture required in all cases.		# Is a picture required in all cases.
	# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.		# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel. (The ages vary from state to state. In Va the agre break down is under 16 and under 21.)
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.
	# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.		# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-18T00:07:56Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 18 December 2020
Line 72:		Line 72:
	# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.		# Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools as ~~school~~ IDs do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools or military as IDs from those do have legal status in many cases.
	# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.		# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-18T00:06:59Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 18 December 2020
Line 73:		Line 73:
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools as school IDs do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools as school IDs do have legal status in many cases.
	# How is revocation of consent ~~should~~ be included in the protocol.		# How should revocation of consent be included in the protocol.

	==Outcome==		==Outcome==

Tomjones: /* Open Questions */

2020-12-17T19:52:48Z

Open Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 17 December 2020
Line 73:		Line 73:
	# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.		# How would 13 and under children be accommodated for example immunizations in travel.
	# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools as school IDs do have legal status in many cases.		# Should this use case be extended to include ID issued by schools as school IDs do have legal status in many cases.
			# How is revocation of consent should be included in the protocol.

	==Outcome==		==Outcome==