Mary Hodder: added comments

2014-12-03T06:03:01Z

added comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 3 December 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:

	=== Mary Hodder ===		=== Mary Hodder ===
			What about "privacy protection metrics" instead of trust metrics? Would that better convey the issues?

Mary Hodder: /* Ann Racuya-Robbins */ formatting

2014-12-03T06:01:37Z

Ann Racuya-Robbins: formatting

New page

Comments:

* Trust ? Can we use a different word? - Group meeting disussion

Comments on the document here

=== Ann Racuya-Robbins ===
In think it would be better to title this User Experience Metric

1. Baseline 
1.1 Assisting the Human User in understanding the user's evolving vulnerabilities in cyberspace and how the evolving NSTIC compliant certified "Trustmark" facilitates in the user's understanding and making of informed choices when establishing relationships within the IDEF identity ecosystem. Such choices should be informed as to security, privacy, usability, and interoperability capabilities and protections provided by the NSTIC compliant certified "Trustmark" presented by a given class or set service providers, community of interest or other IDEF certified entity in the ecosystem(framework). 
 
1.2 Benefits 
 
2. Content 
Measurement should begin by creating a metrics of human understanding of his or her vulnerabilities in cyberspace; the ability and satisfaction the human user has in making informed choices online. Once a human-user understanding-baseline has been agreed upon and established then further metrics can be developed and folded in to the measurement criteria regarding the human user's experience with other aspects of interacting and transacting with the IDEF Identity Ecosystem. 
===tomj===
I don't understand the reluctance to use the word "TRUST", after all we are doing this in support of NSTIC = Trusted Identities in Cyberspace. Without measuring trust I cannot imagine how we are determining whether we have met our goals. 
 
The sections on baseline were taken from a slide deck at plenary. If we want to change the plenary's position, it should be done at the plenary and not in this committee. 
 
Content is the essence of this paper, but it is written as metrics. That is, it is written in terms of measurable quantities. Clearly making informed choices is the essence of what we want to measure, but we need something more specific to ask a user. Vague questions will not enable us to make clear decisions. Typically the best questions are comparative or success metrics, e.g.
# Have you been able to establish an identity with an organization that you trust?
# Have you been able to use that identity on web sites that are important to you?
# Was this experience better than using an email provider like Hotmail or Gmail?
 
One question raised by this is our overall goals here. The question from plenary was whether the UXC could feed suggestions into TFTM. The tone of this comment is more on the order of understanding the broad scope of users in cyberspace. That first goal is achievable. The second goal is way beyond our budget of money or volunteer time. 

=== Mary Hodder ===

Mary Hodder: Created page with "Comments: * Trust ? Can we use a different word? - Group meeting disussion"

2014-10-21T16:40:52Z

Created page with "Comments: * Trust ? Can we use a different word? - Group meeting disussion"

New page

Comments:

* Trust ? Can we use a different word? - Group meeting disussion

Talk:User Experience Trust Metrics - Revision history

Mary Hodder: added comments

Mary Hodder: /* Ann Racuya-Robbins */ formatting

Mary Hodder: Created page with "Comments: * Trust ? Can we use a different word? - Group meeting disussion"