Draft and Candidate Attributes Practices for Review

From IDESG Wiki
Revision as of 21:03, 15 November 2013 by Ann Racuya-Robbins (Talk) (Attributes Ad-hoc Workgroup Draft and Candidate Attributes Practices for Review)

Jump to: navigation, search

Attributes Ad-hoc Workgroup Draft and Candidate Attributes Practices for Review

1. Attributes Practices

Working Drafts

The following Practices have entered Working Draft stage or beyond.

The following table is transcluded from Use Case Catalog.

# Term Contributor AHG Review Status Use Case Lifecycle Stage
#1 Device Integrity supporting User Authentication Tom Jones AHG review 2013-12-18 Compilation
#2 Authenticate Person Use Case Use Case AHG AHG review 2013-12-11 Compilation
#3 Identity Proofing Use Case Use Case AHG AHG review 2013-12-11 Compilation
#4 Cryptographic Authentication for Access to Online Resources Bob Pinheiro AHG review 2013-12-18 Compilation
#5 Delegated Authentication for User Managed Access Bob Pinheiro AHG review 2013-12-18 Compilation
#6 Credential Issuance Use Case Use Case AHG AHG review 2013-12-11 Compilation
#7 Access Age Restricted Content Use Case Use Case AHG AHG review 2014-01-03 Compilation
#8 Privacy Enhanced by User Agent Tom Jones AHG review 2013-12-18 Compilation
#9 Secure Anonymous Digital Identity Ian Dobson AHG review 2014-01-08 Rejected
#10 Trust Elevation Use Case Tom Jones AHG review 2013-12-18 Compilation
#11 Four Party Authentication and Authorization Use Case Use Case AHG AHG review 2013-12-11 Compilation
#12 Un and Underserved People Use Case Ann Racuya-Robbins AHG review 2013-12-11 Compilation
#13 Selectively Disclose Attributes Use Case Matt Thompson AHG review 2014-01-08 Compilation
#14 Remote Electronic Identity Proofing Use Case J. Andrew Hatter AHG review 2014-01-03 Compilation
#15 Remote Employee Verification and Certification Use Case J. Andrew Hatter Nominated by SCC 2013-10-31 Nominated for WD review
#16 IRS Identity Theft Bob Pinheiro Nominated by SCC 2013-10-31 Nominated for WD review
#17 Authentication for Enrollment in a Financial Service Bob Pinheiro Nominated by SCC 2013-10-31 Nominated for WD review
#18 Privacy Enhancing Technologies Tom Jones Nominated by SCC 2014-01-16 Nominated for WD review

The Use Case AHG reviews the use cases in Working Draft stage and provides feedback to use case contributors with the following goals:

  • Removing implementation specific details
  • Applying the updated template and guiding consistent appearance
  • Ensuring the Use Case addresses one or more Guiding Principles and is complete

Upon completion of the review, we inform the Standards Coordinating Committee that the use case is ready for Committee Review status. The SCC may then notify the IDESG committees and stakeholders that the use cases are ready for review and comment. Again, please see the Use Case Lifecycle for more details.




Quick Links: Attributes | Deliverables | Work Plan Space | Work Plan | Work Plan Assumptions