State Issued ID for Healthcare: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==Outcome== | ==Outcome== | ||
# The patient is correctly matched to their electronic health records that may have started when the patient had employer-paid health care. | # The patient is correctly matched to their electronic health records that may have started when the patient had employer-paid health care. | ||
# The patient has a successful telemedicine experience, receives a set of reports, is | # The patient has a successful telemedicine experience, receives a set of reports, is scheduled for a lab test and immunization at the local pharmacy. | ||
# Follow up procedures are created and sent to her smartphone and give her notices when she must take medicine or | # Follow up procedures are created and sent to her smartphone and give her notices when she must take medicine or schedule an appointment for a follow up shot. | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 17:08, 15 December 2020
Full Title
Use case for a state ID describes how the mobile driver's license can be sued as identity proofing credential in healthcare service (aka Medicaid).
Prepared by
Kantara Healthcare Identity Assurance Work Group
Context
- This use case roughly follows the Commonwealth of Virginia example of the DMV running state issued identifiers for services. This scenario is one (or two) of them.
- Many states now use a Healthcare specific identification card (eg the Washington State Apple Card). This use case looks forward to the case where the state has combined all identification cards into a single system.
- It is possible that the state will determine that a single card that services all purposes would be indistinguishable on the web from a mobile driver's license. In that case the permission to drive would just be one attribute of the state ID card.
- Other health issues, including organ donor information, would likely be included as attributes in such a card.
Goal
- To enable the enrollment of a patient with a healthcare identifier that qualifies the holder for state health services.
- Enable remote registration at public libraries or Public Health Centers.
- To ensure that patient is matched to any pertinent existing healthcare records.
Actors
- Actor: Patient, Subject of the State Issued ID
- Actor: Proxy is used here to mean any person that can help the patient get registered. It could be a parent spouse, nursing home personnel, public health professional or similar.
- Actor: Healthcare intake personnel. (Note that these could be a part of the healthcare system, but could equally be in a centralized state Identifier-issuing agency like the DMV).
- Actor: State Healthcare system together with a card that is issued to patients that qualify for public assistence.
Preconditions
- The patient is in need of healthcare using mobile device and is not currently enrolled for state services with a state issued identification card.
- The patient has access to a mobile device that can authenticate the user and communicate to the physician or pratice.
- Alternate use case, the patient only has a library or other public computer.
- For the purposes of registration the registration device must have a camera.
- Or the patient must already be registered with a state issued card that has their picture, such as a driver's license.
Scenarios
Primary Scenario (the patient has a smartphone):
- Patient does not have adequate healthcare coverage and applies to the state for assistance.
- Patient receives notice of appointment and instructions for online registration, or in person if she wants to face the challenges that could attend in-person registration.
- Patient has a mobile driver's license (MDL) or other state-issued ID. (Alternate documents may be used depending on state regulations.)
- Patient has some evidence of prior healthcare coverage, such as an expired health insurance card or current primary physician. (This is not required but would help with patient matching.)
- Note that most states require some proof of residency. This can be as simple as a statement from an employer or a pay stub. Each state will have their own requirements.
- Patient has a mobile wallet that holds the MDL and can take a picture of the insurance card.
- Patient navigates to the telemedicine web site which can send a message to her wallet to provide the mdl and insurance card as an image.
- Her wallet understands that an image of some sort is required and helps with the image capture.
- The data required from the MDL, the image capture and potential other data is presented to the user as a consent screen.
- The patient chooses to send the data to the telemedicine web site.
- The visit with the physician can start immediately, or when the physician becomes available.
Bonus capability.
- The patient is asked for prior health history and is able to navigate to her physician's EHR and get a QR code that can be included in the application to the state which can link the history data.
- The patient has an application (aka wallet) that can authenticate the user's presence and allows the user to enter their existing driver's card as a machine readable image.
Secondary Scenario:
- Patient does not have (or will not use) a smartphone.
- The state can issue a machine readable card that can be scanned at the providers office in the same machine that can scan driver's licenses.
Tertiary Scenario:
- The patient's immunization status can be included for building or travel access.
Problems
- The patient is one of the 19% of the population w/o a smart phone. Perhaps her grandchild can help with that.
- Some states are not very careful to limit the exposure of user private information on a driver's license today (2020-12).
- Getting the wallet into the patients smart phone or lap top may prove to be challenging.
- The patient is not comfortable with technology.
- The cost of the healthcare card is so high in terms of money or legal jeopardy that the patient avoids applying for the card.
Open Questions
- Who determines what data from the ID card is sent to the EHR? (eg. the healthcare community specs or explicit user consent)?
- Patient consent is not yet well described. It is suggested that a taxonomy of categories for patients to select might be a good next step.
- Is the state issued (eg driver's license) ID number included in any way?
- Is a picture required in all cases.
- Is fraud a part of the working group's remit.
Outcome
- The patient is correctly matched to their electronic health records that may have started when the patient had employer-paid health care.
- The patient has a successful telemedicine experience, receives a set of reports, is scheduled for a lab test and immunization at the local pharmacy.
- Follow up procedures are created and sent to her smartphone and give her notices when she must take medicine or schedule an appointment for a follow up shot.
References
- Mobile Driver's License on this wiki.
- Mobile Driver's License in Healthcare on this wiki.