UXC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions

From IDESG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(reframed discussion on references under Action items)
Line 34: Line 34:
# ARR mentioned that UX to consider insertions of the word "transparency" in requirements and supplemental.
# ARR mentioned that UX to consider insertions of the word "transparency" in requirements and supplemental.
# Mary to write up proposal for review of terms <br>
# Mary to write up proposal for review of terms <br>
# Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-­‐ benchmarks.php
# Discussion about reference materials, for example: Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-­‐ benchmarks.php
# Ellen suggests possible standard for SCC: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625
# Ellen suggests possible standard for SCC: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625
# Review other Committee’s requirements for UX guidance.
# Review other Committee’s requirements for UX guidance.

Revision as of 16:36, 23 June 2015

AGENDA for UXC, 9am PT, 12 noon ET, June 23, 2015:
https://idesg.webex.com/idesg/j.php?MTID=m15e3edf756a99940ac7b515ce79e4dc6
1. Call to order (1-6: 3 minutes)
2. Recording question: Yes; Recording policy: https://www.idecosystem.org/page/recording-policy-conduct-meetings
3. Note taking: Linda
a. Attendance
4. Review and approval of agenda
5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy
6. Review and approval of minutes from prior meetings

7. Current Work and Activities Discussion: (50 minutes)

A. Review of UXC Requirements, and Supplemental information, Guidelines and Metrics: https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/User_Experience_Guidelines_Metrics
B. SCC review of KAB starting 7/1/15 ??
C. UXC other docs:
D. Information / Bio Ethics Discussion: future discussion and presentation by ARR

8. Chairs Report
9. Liasons report
10. Other business?

11. Ongoing Action Items (3 minutes)

  1. ARR and Mary to discuss Human Centered Possibility (HCP) driven options in general and a focused response to "How are UX Metrics obtained."
  2. ARR mentioned that UX to consider insertions of the word "transparency" in requirements and supplemental.
  3. Mary to write up proposal for review of terms
  4. Discussion about reference materials, for example: Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-­‐ benchmarks.php
  5. Ellen suggests possible standard for SCC: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625
  6. Review other Committee’s requirements for UX guidance.
  7. Clarify Listing/ Advertising on UX Wiki…Some ideas about how to ha
  8. Mary to ask for MA for ISO Standard Review copy
  9. Create another page(s) for UX review of other committees’ requirements, ARR will be happy to help create these.
  10. A brief paragraph about how to approach the UX wiki may be helpful for new participants…”start with the Agenda…”
  11. UX has an opportunity to weigh in on “Anonymous” term in healthcare.

12. Adjourn