UXC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions

From IDESG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added link to submitted reqs from March)
m (formatting fix)
Line 11: Line 11:
:A.  Election Results and Question - 5 minutes
:A.  Election Results and Question - 5 minutes
:B.  UXC for requirements and guidelines - review FMO response - 45 minutes<br>
:B.  UXC for requirements and guidelines - review FMO response - 45 minutes<br>
:*    Note: Word documents sent via our email list; reqs sent to FMO in March can be found here at the https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/UX_Usability_Requirements_and_Guidelines_Working_Document
:*    Note: Word documents sent via our email list
:*    Reqs sent to FMO in March, 2015 can be found here at the https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/UX_Usability_Requirements_and_Guidelines_Working_Document
:C.  UXC other docs - held to future weeks:
:C.  UXC other docs - held to future weeks:
:*    Design Pattern Work located here: <br>
:*    Design Pattern Work located here: <br>

Revision as of 20:12, 19 May 2015

AGENDA for UXC, 9am PT, 12 noon ET, May 19, 2015:
https://idesg.webex.com/idesg/j.php?MTID=m15e3edf756a99940ac7b515ce79e4dc6
1. Call to order (1-6: 3 minutes)
2. Recording question: Yes; Recording policy: https://www.idecosystem.org/page/recording-policy-conduct-meetings
3. Note taking: Linda
a. Attendance
4. Review and approval of agenda
5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy
6. Review and approval of minutes from prior meetings
7. Current Work and Activities Discussion: (55 minutes)

A. Election Results and Question - 5 minutes
B. UXC for requirements and guidelines - review FMO response - 45 minutes
C. UXC other docs - held to future weeks:
D. Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-benchmarks.php
E. Information Ethics Discussion: anything else?

8. Chairs Report
9. Other business?
10. Ongoing Action Items (3 minutes)

  1. ARR: recommended UXC have someone knowledgeable from a design and development perspective give us background and how we might integrate into the requirements. Will find.
  2. Mary to write up proposal for review of terms
  3. Ellen suggests possible standard for SCC: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625

12. Adjourn