Talk:UX Usability Requirements and Guidelines Working Document: Difference between revisions
Mary Hodder (talk | contribs) (Added Bev Corwin's comments from 12/16/14) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 16:33, 6 January 2015
Noreen Comments
Looks like some of my comments under HL 1 should actually be placed under HL 2 these have to do with look/feel and system changes rather than language issues. Also HL 6 addresses language and perhaps could be incorporated in HL 2 instead of under its own guideline. The example given re NSTIC guiding principle 32 that is used as basis for HL 6 seems to be addressing the same natural language issues that HL 2 addresses.
Bev Corwin's Comments
FYI: My biggest concerns about this discussion:
1. That we do not effectively legislate any small businesses, particularly mom and pop shops, out of business with all these ideas around increasing demands on them that IDESG seems to be going.
2. Seem to be forgetting the "voluntary" guiding principle. Far too rigid thinking. (It's not "our - IDESG's" ecosystem - we do not "own" the ecosystem)
3. Multidirectional, multimodal thinking is missing.
4. Costs of implementation is no discussed at all, and it will be a huge defining factor.