UXC Meeting Agenda: Difference between revisions
Mary Hodder (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mary Hodder (talk | contribs) (june 23 2014 meeting agenda) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
AGENDA for UXC | AGENDA for UXC meeting, 12pm PT, 3pm ET, June 23, 2014:<br> | ||
1. Call to order <br> | 1. Call to order <br> | ||
2. Recording question<br> | 2. Recording question<br> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
4. Review and approval of agenda<br> | 4. Review and approval of agenda<br> | ||
5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy <br> | 5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy <br> | ||
6. Review of minutes from last meeting <br> | 6. Review of minutes from last meeting (sent out last night)<br> | ||
7. Liaison reports <br> | 7. Liaison reports <br> | ||
8. Current Work:<br> | 8. Current Work and Activites:<br> | ||
a. | a. Plenary review and UXC breakout <br> | ||
b. The Standards Committee Use Case Review -- Tom Jones sent us a document, and Mary Hodder included tracked comments. Document sent to the list for one last review | |||
in order that to provide feedback to the Standard's Committee with User Experience issues: <br> | |||
b. The Standards Committee Use Case Review -- Tom Jones sent us a document, | |||
REF: Revised USE CASE document: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/21?fid=1272 <br> | REF: Revised USE CASE document: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/21?fid=1272 <br> | ||
UCAGH (USE CASE working group) approved comment dispositions: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/68?fid=1274 <br> | UCAGH (USE CASE working group) approved comment dispositions: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/68?fid=1274 <br> | ||
c. Other work? <br> | c. Other work? <br> | ||
How can we work with other committees and what work can we do going forward to be most helpful to other groups and projects, and the NSTIC principles as a whole?<br> | Question at UXC breakout was: How can we work with other committees and what work can we do going forward to be most helpful to other groups and projects, and the NSTIC principles as a whole? REVIEW ADN COMMENTS<br> | ||
9. Chair's report <br> | 9. Chair's report <br> | ||
10. New business <br> | 10. New business <br> | ||
11. Action Items <br> | 11. Action Items <br> | ||
a. Functional Model?<br> | a. Functional Model?<br> | ||
b. ?<br> | b. ? <br> | ||
12. Adjourn <br> | 12. Adjourn <br> | ||
Revision as of 05:25, 23 June 2014
AGENDA for UXC meeting, 12pm PT, 3pm ET, June 23, 2014:
1. Call to order
2. Recording question
3. Note taking (mary)
4. Review and approval of agenda
5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy
6. Review of minutes from last meeting (sent out last night)
7. Liaison reports
8. Current Work and Activites:
a. Plenary review and UXC breakout
b. The Standards Committee Use Case Review -- Tom Jones sent us a document, and Mary Hodder included tracked comments. Document sent to the list for one last review
in order that to provide feedback to the Standard's Committee with User Experience issues:
REF: Revised USE CASE document: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/21?fid=1272
UCAGH (USE CASE working group) approved comment dispositions: https://www.idecosystem.org/filedepot/folder/68?fid=1274
c. Other work?
Question at UXC breakout was: How can we work with other committees and what work can we do going forward to be most helpful to other groups and projects, and the NSTIC principles as a whole? REVIEW ADN COMMENTS
9. Chair's report
10. New business
11. Action Items
a. Functional Model?
b. ?
12. Adjourn