UXC Meeting Agenda

AGENDA for UXC, 9am PT, 12 noon ET, June 30, 2015:
https://idesg.webex.com/idesg/j.php?MTID=m15e3edf756a99940ac7b515ce79e4dc6
1. Call to order (1-6: 3 minutes)
2. Recording question: Yes; Recording policy: https://www.idecosystem.org/page/recording-policy-conduct-meetings
3. Note taking: ?
a. Attendance
4. Review and approval of agenda
5. IPR Rules: https://www.idecosystem.org/iprpolicy
6. Review and approval of minutes from prior meetings
7. Current Work and Activities Discussion: (50 minutes)

A. Review of UXC Requirements, and Supplemental information, Guidelines and Metrics: https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/User_Experience_Guidelines_Metrics

• Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-benchmarks.php
  • reference materials: UXC requirements and guidelines
    
    • Note: Word documents sent via our email list last FRIDAY
    • Reqs sent to FMO in March, 2015 can be found here at the https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/UX_Usability_Requirements_and_Guidelines_Working_Document
• Discussion for Privacy review of language in a couple of our requirements. Copied from UX Meeting Minutes for April 7, 2015. Request is located here: https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/Talk:UX_Usability_Requirements_and_Guidelines_Working_Document
  

UPCOMING post Reqs

C. Review of other committee's work product

• Review other Committee’s requirements for UX guidance.

D. UXC other docs:

• Design Pattern Work located here:
  
  • Common Design Pattern and fit with Reqs / Guidelines: https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/Common_to_any_Internet_Identity_Ecosystem
    
  • Trustmark Evolving Pattern: https://www.idecosystem.org/wiki/Trustmark_Evolving_Pattern
    

E. Information / Bio Ethics Discussion: future discussion and presentation by ARR

8. Chairs Report
9. Liaisons report
10. Other business?
11. Ongoing Action Items (3 minutes)

1. ARR and Mary to discuss Human Centered Possibility (HCP) driven options in general and a focused response to "How are UX Metrics obtained."
2. ARR mentioned that UX to consider insertions of the word "transparency" in supplemental guidance.
3. Discussion about reference materials and what to include in our page on References, including disclosure, for example: Metrics document for UX Benchmarks: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ux-­‐ benchmarks.php
4. Ellen suggests possible standard for SCC: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=58625
5. Mary to ask for MA for ISO Standard Review copy
6. Create another page(s) for UX review of other committees’ requirements, ARR will be happy to help create these.
7. A brief paragraph about how to approach the UX wiki may be helpful for new participants…”start with the Agenda…”
8. UX has an opportunity to weigh in on “Anonymous” term in healthcare.
9. Mary to write up proposal for review of terms
   

12. Adjourn