Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...d digital entities to avail themselves of authentication services for each identifier in their data base. All except Facebook allow pseudonymous users. All have #Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems have been deployed in enterprises for decades, mos
    12 KB (2,064 words) - 19:21, 28 May 2020
  • ...gā€ is about this property. Without it, we will not be able to optimize the relationship. ...nd b are about the same subject, U, it either has to contain a common user identifier or nonce. Both A and B may be able to attest many claims, but for collectio
    31 KB (5,332 words) - 04:35, 27 November 2023
  • ...tes, and only those attributes that are required to establish and retain a relationship between one user and one relying party. is the traditional role for an Identifier provider (IdP). In some ways it becomes an anachronism as we disassemble, e
    8 KB (1,238 words) - 16:37, 26 August 2021
  • ...ay or may not validate the initial complaint. That is the start of a trust relationship. # User ID = the identifier used by the patient or guardian when the sign into the provider or IHE port
    20 KB (3,074 words) - 22:40, 21 March 2021
  • |sub ||identifier of the RO || the grantor of access||MUST |puid || Persistent Identifier of RO || to handle recovery operation||MAY
    7 KB (1,127 words) - 21:03, 15 April 2021
  • ...ent resource contains two elements that refer back to the source: a master identifier, and a direct reference to content from which this Consent Statement was de # Only after such a relationship has been establish the website can ask the user for access to healthcare da
    10 KB (1,599 words) - 22:38, 20 March 2021
  • * [http://openid.net/specs/openid-heart-oauth2-1_0.htmlHealth Relationship Trust Profile for OAuth 2.0] * [http://openid.net/specs/openid-heart-fhir-oauth2-1_0.html Health Relationship Trust Profile for Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) OAuth 2
    4 KB (637 words) - 01:02, 19 March 2020
  • ...ay or may not validate the initial complaint. That is the start of a trust relationship. ...[[Identity Proofing]] to be used with other providers we need to create an identifier for the user with level 2 assurance.
    19 KB (2,997 words) - 01:34, 18 February 2021
  • * The high level goal is the establishment and maintenance of a relationship (binding) between the subject and one organization. # User consent only matters where there is an ongoing relationship between two entities.
    14 KB (2,250 words) - 01:29, 23 December 2020
  • ...or her health data in one location or obtaining a voluntary unique patient identifier. The research identified several criteria to evaluate each solution, includ * If an attacker learns either your subject identifier or medical record locator, they can claim ownership. In a well-designed sys
    19 KB (3,008 words) - 20:23, 20 March 2021
  • ...ay or may not validate the initial complaint. That is the start of a trust relationship. ...the protected key pair. The public part of the key pair is, in effect, an identifier of the patient.
    28 KB (4,415 words) - 17:28, 21 March 2021
  • # There will be multiple identifier frameworks (aka methods or profiles) which have their own set of identity r ...OpenID, it is oriented to enterprise environments where there is already a relationship with the users, there is no similar metadata standard for open environments
    5 KB (788 words) - 16:34, 16 April 2019
  • # Solution to the TEFCA requirement for Level 2 identifier assurance based on NIST 800-63-3 (A) for IAL2 and (B) for AAL2. ...cation and has mandated that many agencies will need to create their own [[Identifier]]s. This has not yet impacted medicare nor the providers' database keys whi
    18 KB (2,580 words) - 18:52, 7 December 2020
  • ===Identifier used in Best Practices=== ====Selection of the format of the Identifier====
    24 KB (3,980 words) - 19:57, 13 November 2020
  • ...identifiers may be used, for example an HTTPS connection always creates an identifier. Kerberos defines an anonymous connection in [https://www.rfc-editor.org/pd The user provides or permits some identifier that can be reused over time to link a continued presence. The RP does not
    10 KB (1,662 words) - 23:06, 24 April 2019
  • .../tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Identifier_or_Attribute_Provider Identifier or Attribute providers]. .../tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Identifier_or_Attribute_Provider Identifier or Attribute Provider], other sources are likely to occur in real-world sce
    13 KB (2,151 words) - 00:14, 30 October 2020
  • ...e identity provider will be a distinct role from the RP where a persistent identifier across multiple interactions is desireable. # Identifier of the RP must be supplied to the user agent in a secure message, such as a
    17 KB (2,712 words) - 19:20, 28 November 2021
  • ...ationship Identifier]], [[Service]], [[Software]], [[System]], [[Synthetic Identifier]]
    2 KB (204 words) - 04:02, 28 June 2018

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)