Consent: Difference between revisions

From IDESG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
==Context==
==Context==
* The term Resource Owner (RO) is often used for the entity that control release of information. That term is misleading in that many controllers do not, in fact or in law, own the data.
* The term Resource Owner (RO) is often used for the entity that control release of information. That term is misleading in that many controllers do not, in fact or in law, own the data.
* <Blockquote>The model of Notice & Consent, therefore, is
no longer relegated strictly to the legal realm;
it is inherently a human-technology interaction
problem, one that requires the expertise of those
professionals and academics versed in human-
computer interaction issues and, ideally, public
policy and ethics.
As discussed above, taking a step back to adopt
a global, technologically neutral approach that
is ethical, includes an awareness of society and
involves industry is key. And, critically, professional
UX designers – who fundamentally understand
how people interact with technology – will need
to tap into design thinking to try to address this
intractable problem.
How do we move forward?
Industry must
be included in this
conversation at all
stages or we risk
a race towards
compliance for
compliance’s sake.
Redesigning Data Privacy: Reimagining Notice & Consent for human-technology interaction</Blockquote>
==Problems==
==Problems==



Revision as of 02:44, 3 August 2020

Full Title or Meme

In the context of Identity Management Consent will mean the determination of the Intent of a Subject to Authorize the release of data that might be in the message or on a Resource Server whose release is controlled by the Subject.

Context

  • The term Resource Owner (RO) is often used for the entity that control release of information. That term is misleading in that many controllers do not, in fact or in law, own the data.
  • The model of Notice & Consent, therefore, is

no longer relegated strictly to the legal realm; it is inherently a human-technology interaction problem, one that requires the expertise of those professionals and academics versed in human- computer interaction issues and, ideally, public policy and ethics. As discussed above, taking a step back to adopt a global, technologically neutral approach that is ethical, includes an awareness of society and involves industry is key. And, critically, professional UX designers – who fundamentally understand how people interact with technology – will need to tap into design thinking to try to address this intractable problem. How do we move forward?

Industry must 

be included in this conversation at all stages or we risk a race towards compliance for compliance’s sake.

Redesigning Data Privacy: Reimagining Notice & Consent for human-technology interaction

Problems

Solutions

References