User Notice: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* the [[Consent Receipt]] should be considered as the initial messaged from the [[Data Controller]] to the user. | * the [[Consent Receipt]] should be considered as the initial messaged from the [[Data Controller]] to the user. | ||
*[[User recovery and redress]] is dependent on no [[User Notice]] for operations. | *[[User recovery and redress]] is dependent on no [[User Notice]] for operations. | ||
===Open Notice=== | |||
The effort that resulted in the* [[Consent Receipt]] was the first of open noice messages. | |||
* [https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2638728.2641681 Usable consents: tracking and managing use of personal data with a consent transaction receipt] was published by Mark Lazar and Mary Hodder on 2014-09 at UbiComp '14 | |||
* [https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/infosharing/2014/07/13/Open+Notice+Registry+Data+Flows Open Notice Registry Data Flows] was contributed to the Kantara Consent and Information Sharing work group by John Wudnerlich on (2014-07-13. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category:Glossary]] | [[Category:Glossary]] | ||
Revision as of 20:58, 15 February 2020
Full Title or Meme
User's have the right to notification of disclosures of the private information.
Context
- Privacy regulations now require Data Controllers to notify the users or
- the Consent Receipt should be considered as the initial messaged from the Data Controller to the user.
- User recovery and redress is dependent on no User Notice for operations.
Open Notice
The effort that resulted in the* Consent Receipt was the first of open noice messages.
- Usable consents: tracking and managing use of personal data with a consent transaction receipt was published by Mark Lazar and Mary Hodder on 2014-09 at UbiComp '14
- Open Notice Registry Data Flows was contributed to the Kantara Consent and Information Sharing work group by John Wudnerlich on (2014-07-13.